ReviewArchives of microbiology2025
Environmental fate of antibiotic resistance genes in livestock farming.
Review in Archives of microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- GlobalEnvironmental science and ecotechnology · 2026Article
- Airborne Movement of Antibiotic Resistance Genes Between Livestock Stables and Farmers' Homes.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Cross-sectional comparative shotgun metagenomic analysis of the subgingival resistome in healthy subjects and patients with periodontitis from four countries.Journal of oral microbiology · 2026Article
- The role of gut microbiome in antimicrobial resistance transmission between companion animals and livestock: mechanisms, drivers, and One Health implications.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Silica Nanoparticles Block Natural Genetic Transformation inACS omega · 2025Article
- Comparative biosafety and efficacy of Pseudomonas fluorescens PFS and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ZPZ against Ralstonia solanacearum.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- From Farm to Slaughter: Tracing Antimicrobial Resistance in a Poultry Short Food Chain.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As emerging environmental pollutants, antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) are prevalent in livestock farms and their surrounding environments. Although existing studies have focused on ARGs in specific environmental media, comprehensive research on ARGs within farming environments and their adjacent areas remains scarce. This review explores the sources, pollution status, and transmission pathways of ARGs from farms to the surrounding environment. Drawing on the "One Health" concept, it also discusses the potential risks of ARGs transmission from animals to human pathogens and the resulting impact on human health. Our findings suggest that the emergence of ARGs in livestock farming environments primarily results from intrinsic resistance and genetic mutations, while their spread is largely driven by horizontal gene transfer. The distribution of ARGs varies according to the type of resistance genes, seasonal changes, and the medium in which they are present. ARGs are disseminated into the surrounding environment via pathways such as manure application, wastewater discharge, and aerosol diffusion. They may be absorbed by humans, accumulating in the intestinal microbiota and subsequently affecting human health. The spread of ARGs is influenced by the interplay of microbial communities, antibiotics, heavy metals, emerging pollutants, and environmental factors. Additionally, we have outlined three control strategies: reducing the emergence of ARGs at the source, controlling their spread, and minimizing human exposure. This article provides a theoretical framework and scientific guidance for understanding the cross-media migration of microbial resistance in livestock farming environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40214801What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.