Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40214796›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2025

Wear resistance of orthodontic attachments: a comparative analysis of different composite resins in clear aligner therapy.

Irmak Ocak, Hande Gorucu-Coskuner, Muge Aksu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Irmak OcakDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Sihhiye Kampusu, 7. Kat, Altindag, Ankara, Türkiye. irmak.ocak@hacettepe.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4547-3595
Hande Gorucu-CoskunerDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Sihhiye Kampusu, 7. Kat, Altindag, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7426-6731
Muge AksuPrivate Practice, Beytepe Mah. , Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Blv, Mira Ofis No: 15/39, Cankaya, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4705-460X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveClear aligner attachments play a crucial role in facilitating tooth movement in clear aligner treatments. This in-vitro study evaluates the wear of attachments made from 4 different composite resins during orthodontic therapy. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study included 32 extracted human premolar and molar teeth, divided into four groups based on the composite resin used: Flow Tain, Transbond XT, G-aenial Universal Flo, and Filtek Z350 XT. Horizontal rectangular attachments were bonded to the teeth, which underwent thermal cycling and tooth brushing to mimic clinical conditions. Micro-CT analysis measured volumetric and linear changes in attachment wear. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test and Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by pairwise comparisons with the Mann-Whitney U Test.

resultsAll composite resins exhibited a significant decrease in attachment volume after aging. The greatest volume reduction was observed in the Transbond XT group, while the least reduction occurred in the G-aenial Universal Flo group. Significant differences were found in the occlusal and gingival thirds of the attachments, with Flow Tain showing the highest wear in all regions.

conclusionThe study shows that the wear of orthodontic attachments is greatly influenced by the type of composite resin used. The results indicate that G-aenial Universal Flo composite resin may offer superior wear resistance, preserving attachment integrity more efficiently throughout orthodontic treatment than the other 3 composite resins. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings can assist clinicians in choosing composite materials that improve treatment effectiveness by preserving attachment integrity over time.

Indexed as

Composite ResinsOrthodontic Appliances, RemovableTooth Movement TechniquesHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMaterials TestingResin CementsSurface PropertiesX-Ray MicrotomographyComposite Resinsfiltek Z350Resin CementsTransbond XTAttachment wearClear alignerConventional attachmentMicro-CT

Identifiers

PMID40214796
PMCPMC11991971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.