ArticlePediatric surgery international2025
Surgical technique experience and results for concealed penis.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Modified versus traditional Devine procedure for pediatric concealed penis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Canadian journal of urology · 2026Pooled it
- A novel full-thickness skin graft technique for the surgical management of congenital buried penis in children.Asian journal of andrology · 2026Article
- Transcriptomic identification of IL-17/FOS-associated signaling in dartos fascia remodeling of pediatric concealed penis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Efficacy analysis of modified circumcision in the treatment of pediatric concealed penis.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionConcealed penis is a condition characterized by the normal-sized penis being hidden within the pubic tissues, leading to functional and psychological issues. According to Maizels' classification, it is divided into subtypes, including buried, webbed, and trapped penis. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of patients operated on using the surgical technique proposed by Borsellino and colleagues. PATIENTS AND
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 39 patients diagnosed with buried penis who underwent surgery between January 2020 and December 2023. The patients had a mean age of 8.2 years, with a follow-up duration ranging from 1 to 2.5 years. The surgical technique was performed under general anesthesia, involving complete dissection of the penile shaft, release of abnormal dartos adhesions, and restoration of normal penopubic and penoscrotal angles. In cases of skin deficiency, corrective procedures such as dorsal skin flaps and ventral V-Y plasty were utilized.
resultsThe mean operative time was recorded as 66 min. Most patients experienced short-term postoperative edema and pain. Early recurrence was observed in 4 patients (10.2%), predominantly among obese individuals. Penile rotation and poor cosmetic satisfaction were noted in one case. Long-term cosmetic outcomes were evaluated as positive by both patients and their families.
conclusionThe surgical technique applied was found to be effective and reliable for concealed penis correction. The method demonstrated low complication rates, ease of application, and high patient satisfaction. Early surgical intervention (12-24 months) is considered beneficial for physical and psychological outcomes. Postoperative education and dietary recommendations appear to contribute to the success of the surgical approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40214793What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.