ArticlePsychological research2025
Saccade-induced temporal distortion: opposing effects of time expansion and compression.
Article in Psychological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychometric functions for temporal discrimination: Duration or log duration?Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- The speed limit of visual perception: Bidirectional influence of image memorability and processing speed on perceived duration and recognition.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Saccadic eye movements, or saccades, can distort our perception of time, as evidenced by the phenomenon of Chronostasis, where the first event after a saccade appears to last longer than it actually does. However, the impact of saccades on events following the first has never been explored. Here, we compared how participants perceived durations of first and second intervals after a saccade with their perceived durations during fixation, where no saccades occurred. We found that saccades lengthened the perceived duration of the first event, confirming Chronostasis. Moreover, when the second event occurred right after the first, its duration was perceived as shorter. Interestingly, when the second event was used as a reference, the Chronostasis effect was even stronger. Notably, this shortening of the second event persisted even when we ruled out processes like the "attentional blink" that might interfere with the timing between the two events. Our findings suggest that saccades induce a brief, uneven distribution of attentional processing in time, leading to an overestimation of the first and an underestimation of the second interval when the two intervals occur close together.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.