Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40214786›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2025

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty reduced mid-term incidences of multiple orthopaedic complications: A large database study.

Jared D Wainwright, Samuel S Gay, Joshua T Ou, Adam Nguyen, Bardia Barimani, Joseph C Wenke

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Risk of periprosthetic joint infection within 1 year following robotic-assisted versus conventional primary total knee arthroplasty: a propensity-score-matched cohort study.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jared D WainwrightDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, USA.
Samuel S GayDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, USA. ssgay@utmb.edu.
Joshua T OuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, USA.
Adam NguyenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, USA.
Bardia BarimaniDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, USA.
Joseph C WenkeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRobotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) provides surgeons the ability to make more accurate bone cuts and reduce outliers associated with conventional, jig-based total knee arthroplasty (cTKA). Despite its increase in popularity there continues to be insufficient data showing an improvement in mid-term patient outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe TriNetX Research Database was retrospectively queried for patients undergoing primary TKA with a follow up of at least 5 years after index surgery. Patient records with surgeries performed between January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2019. Records with comorbid indications other than primary TKA were excluded such as distal femur fractures, pathologic fractures, or revision arthroplasty. Propensity score matching at one-to-one ratio was performed to reduce confounding of preoperative risks. Outcomes of aseptic loosening, prosthetic joint infection, instability, periprosthetic fracture, and revision were queried at 1, 3, and 5 years.

resultsIn this study, 141,613 patients met all study eligibility requirements with 129,622 patients and 11,991 patients in the cTKA and rTKA cohorts, respectively. At 5 years, patients in the rTKA cohort had lower incidence of aseptic loosening (OR 0.335, 95% CI 0.224-0.501), prosthetic joint infection (OR 0.529, 95% CI 0.417-0.672), revisions (OR 0.758, 95% CI 0.609-0.943), and all complications combined (OR 0.640, 95% CI 0.550-0.745).

conclusionsRobotic TKA was found to be associated with a reduction in aseptic loosening, prosthetic joint infections, revisions, and all complications combined. This improvement in mid-term patient outcomes is observed at multiple time points out to 5 years, both before and after propensity score matching.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneePostoperative ComplicationsRobotic Surgical ProceduresAgedAged, 80 and overDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedReoperationRetrospective StudiesAseptic looseningMid-term outcomesRetrospective databaseRevision arthroplastyRobotic total knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.