ReviewNeuroradiology2025
Pre-treatment and post-treatment nasopharyngeal carcinoma imaging: imaging updates, pearls and pitfalls.
Review in Neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pediatric Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC).Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- The application of grayscale quantitative analysis in the differential diagnosis of necrosis between cervical lymph node metastases in nasopharyngeal carcinoma and tuberculous lymphadenitis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- MRI-based model for individualized prediction of skull bone destruction and EBV DNA-related risk stratification in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeNasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is endemic in Southeast Asia, requiring precise imaging for personalized treatment. This review highlights key imaging challenges and updates from recent literature, emphasizing findings that impact oncological management.
methodsWe discuss common and uncommon clinical entities, detailing salient imaging features and diagnostic distinctions to aid accurate interpretation.
resultsIn the pre-treatment setting, leveraging the characteristic MR signals and spread patterns of NPC aids in defining the tumor volume for accurate staging and radiotherapy contouring. Key diagnostic challenges include differentiating tumor from benign hyperplasia, skull base osteomyelitis, and other skull base tumors. Perineural tumor spread, radiological extranodal extension and nodal necrosis further refine primary tumor and nodal assessment. In the post-treatment setting, the key question is whether tumor recurrence exists. Diagnostic challenges involve distinguishing tumor recurrence from scar tissue, post-radiation nasopharyngeal necrosis, or hypertrophied cervical ganglia. For recurrences, endoscopic nasopharyngectomy has emerged as the preferred approach over open surgery or re-irradiation. The text highlights characteristic post-treatment appearances and emphasizes recognizing these patterns to avoid misinterpretation and guide appropriate management.
conclusionImaging plays a pivotal role in NPC precision oncology. Mastering imaging pearls and pitfalls empowers radiologists to provide clinicians with reliable, actionable guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.