ReviewHNO2025
[Individualized implant selection for an anatomically normal cochlea : Cochlear implant surgery on the way to personalized medicine].
Review in HNO, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Etiology-Driven Personalized Cochlear Implantation: Implications for Electrode Choice, Timing, and Outcomes.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDue to the anatomical variety of the human cochlea and the many factors that may determine the choice of the cochlear array, there is no one-size-fits-all method for determining the right implant. The cochlear size, preoperative residual hearing, anatomical variants, operative technique, and cause of deafness must be taken into consideration when making this decision.
objectiveThis work aims to spread awareness of precision surgery and provide an overview. MATERIALS AND TECHNIQUES: Factors that contribute to individualization are explained, and future advances are outlined.
resultsThe optimum treatment, if possible, is electroacoustic stimulation. Cochlear coverage of approximately 80% should be the goal when using electrical stimulation alone.
conclusionIn order to maximize rehabilitation results, recent developments in cochlear implantation mark a paradigm shift away from standardized treatments and toward individualized therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.