ReviewNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2025
Emerging new immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumor immunotherapy.
Review in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rethinking Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: Integrative Genomics, Immunotherapy, and Molecular-Orthomolecular Strategies.Cancers · 2026Review
- Targeting Lipid Metabolic Reprogramming to Overcome Immunotherapy Resistance: Systemic Nutritional Modulation and Precision Nanomedicine.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Nanocarrier-based immunotherapy for viral diseases.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2025Review
- Dual targeting of TIGIT and VISTA in non-small-cell lung cancer immunotherapy.EXCLI journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionised cancer therapy and has led to improved outcomes for patients with many cancers. While proven inhibitors targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD- 1), programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA- 4) have had great success, new ICIs are on the horizon. However, data from clinical trials indicate that some patients develop resistance to ICIs targeting PD- 1/L1 and/or CTLA- 4 for multiple mechanisms. This gives rise to the idea that combining therapy by using multiple ICIs could help overcome this resistance through the inhibition of multiple pathways and immune checkpoints. Therefore, the new generation of immune checkpoint inhibitors opens up new therapeutic candidates for solid tumors. This review covers novel checkpoint agents, including T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain 3 (TIM- 3), lymphocyte activating gene 3 (LAG- 3), and other promising pathways, including Ig V domain suppressor for T cell activation (VISTA). We review the underlying mechanisms of these targets, how they have been developed in the laboratory and clinic, and the initial efficacy and safety seen in ongoing trials. We also discuss combination strategies to further improve their therapeutic potential. By identifying challenges and opportunities with these new agents, this review explores the direction in which immunotherapy for solid tumors is headed and calls for further research in this emerging field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40214728What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.