ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
Non-contrast cine magnetic resonance urography in evaluating and monitoring of primary obstructive megaureter: a case series study.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pediatric magnetic resonance urography from patient preparation to post-processing: basics and controversies.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the feasibility and usefulness of cine magnetic resonance urography (MRU) as a novel examination for primary obstructive megaureter (POM). MATERIAL AND
methodsThe study was conducted on 44 patients with POM who underwent cine MRU from May 2020 to October 2022. Referring to the international system of vesicoureteral reflux, patients were divided into the low-risk (grade I-IV) and the high-risk (grade V) groups. From the ureterovesical orifice to the ureteropelvic junction, the ureteral contraction ratio was measured at every 10% of the total length of the ureter.
resultsA total of 44 patients and 53 ureters with POM who underwent cine MRU were included. The contraction ratios were lower in the high-risk group than those in the low-risk group, with significant differences at the distal 10% (12.91% vs 29.02%, p < 0.001) and 20% levels (16.50% vs 32.34%, p = 0.019). After surgery, the ureteral contraction ratios at the 10% and 20% levels have a significant improvement (42.05% vs 21.00%, p = 0.001; 52.30% vs 27.50%, p = 0.003). We further found the ureteral contraction ratio at the 10% level being as a predictor of surgical technique. When the ureteral contraction ratio at 10% level was less than 12.67%, reimplantation may be more appropriate (AUC = 0.900, p < 0.001; The Youden index = 0.800).
conclusionThe ureteral contractile activity at different levels in cine MRU can be used to evaluate the severity and treatment effectiveness, and also have certain reference value for the selection of surgical methods. Larger, multicenter studies are warranted to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40214700What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.