ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
Development of a model combining CEUS LI-RADS and clinical features for predicting glypican-3 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and clinical features for preoperative prediction of GPC-3 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Noninvasive prediction of glypican-3 expression and recurrence-free survival in hepatocellular carcinoma using contrast-enhanced ultrasound.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Article
- Preoperative Prediction of Glypican-3 Expression in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Sonazoid Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Radiomics.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
- High frame rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound in hepatocellular carcinoma: biological characteristics and patient outcomes.BMC cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo establish a predictive model incorporating clinical features and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) for predicting glypican-3 (GPC3) expression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
methodsA total of 142 HCC patients between January 2020 to June 2021 in our institution were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent CEUS before surgery, and the reference standard was immunohistochemical analysis of surgical specimen. The clinical features, conventional ultrasound features, and CEUS LI-RADS features of patients in the GPC3-positive and GPC3-negative groups were evaluated and compared. The variables screened by multivariable logistic regression were used to develop a model for predicting GPC3 expression and the predictive precision and clinical utility of the model was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis and decision curve analysis.
resultsAmong the 142 HCC patients, 96 (67.6%) were classified as LR-4/5 lesions, 46 (32.4%) were classified as LR-M lesions, 101 (71.1%) were GPC3-positive and 41 (28.9%) were negative. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that younger age (OR = 0.947; 95% CI: 0.910-0.985; p = 0.007), alpha-fetoprotein > 400 ng/ml (OR = 5.202; 95% CI: 1.808-14.966; p = 0.002) and LI-RADS M (OR = 2.822; 95% CI: 1.101-7.236; p = 0.031) was independent risk factors for GPC3-positive HCC. The model combining clinical features and LI-RADS categories showed better performance than single variable, with AUC of 0.759 (p < 0.05). The nomogram and decision curves revealed substantial clinical benefit of the prediction model in predicting GPC3 expression.
conclusionThe combined model incorporating clinical features and CEUS LI-RADS achieved a satisfactory performance for predicting GPC3 expression in HCC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40214698What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.