ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
Comparison of different machine learning methods in the prediction of early recurrence in HCC patients with Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop machine learning models that are driven by Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI features for the preoperative prediction of early recurrence in HCC and compare them to the previously proposed ERASL-pre method.
methodsThis retrospective study consisted of 311 consecutive patients who underwent curative hepatic resection between January 2013 and July 2021. Among them, 131 patients with early recurrence of HCC and 180 patients without early recurrence of HCC. The MR images were independently reviewed by two radiologists. Logistic regression, classification tree, random forest, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), support vector machines (SVM), and neural network (Nnet) were the six machine learning algorithms used. The baseline model was ERASL-pre. Different models' discrimination, calibration, and overall performance were evaluated and compared.
resultsThe baseline ERASL-pre obtained AUCs of 0.703 and 0.716, respectively. In comparison to ERASL-pre, the AUCs for logistic regression, random forest, and SVM were higher but not substantially different. XGBoost produced AUCs for Readers 1 and 2 of 0.720 and 0.685, respectively. Nnet achieved marginally lower but not statistically different AUCs in comparison to ERASL-pre, whereas the classification tree achieved the lowest AUCs. The logistic regression model had the optimal overall net benefit across the majority of the range of reasonable threshold probabilities. Good agreement was observed between prediction and observation in the ERASL-pre and the logistic regression model for both readers.
conclusionThe logistic regression model performed better in predicting an early recurrence of HCC with Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI. In addition, the model is more sensitive than the baseline ERASL-pre model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40214696What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.