Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40214696›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025

Comparison of different machine learning methods in the prediction of early recurrence in HCC patients with Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI.

Shu Wen Sun, Xun Xu, Qiu Ping Liu, Fei Peng Zhu, Yu Dong Zhang, Xi Sheng Liu

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shu Wen SunThe First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xun XuThe First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Qiu Ping LiuThe First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Fei Peng ZhuThe First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yu Dong ZhangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xi Sheng LiuThe First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. njmu_lxs@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop machine learning models that are driven by Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI features for the preoperative prediction of early recurrence in HCC and compare them to the previously proposed ERASL-pre method.

methodsThis retrospective study consisted of 311 consecutive patients who underwent curative hepatic resection between January 2013 and July 2021. Among them, 131 patients with early recurrence of HCC and 180 patients without early recurrence of HCC. The MR images were independently reviewed by two radiologists. Logistic regression, classification tree, random forest, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), support vector machines (SVM), and neural network (Nnet) were the six machine learning algorithms used. The baseline model was ERASL-pre. Different models' discrimination, calibration, and overall performance were evaluated and compared.

resultsThe baseline ERASL-pre obtained AUCs of 0.703 and 0.716, respectively. In comparison to ERASL-pre, the AUCs for logistic regression, random forest, and SVM were higher but not substantially different. XGBoost produced AUCs for Readers 1 and 2 of 0.720 and 0.685, respectively. Nnet achieved marginally lower but not statistically different AUCs in comparison to ERASL-pre, whereas the classification tree achieved the lowest AUCs. The logistic regression model had the optimal overall net benefit across the majority of the range of reasonable threshold probabilities. Good agreement was observed between prediction and observation in the ERASL-pre and the logistic regression model for both readers.

conclusionThe logistic regression model performed better in predicting an early recurrence of HCC with Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI. In addition, the model is more sensitive than the baseline ERASL-pre model.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularContrast MediaGadolinium DTPAImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedLiver NeoplasmsMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesContrast MediaGadolinium DTPAgadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPAGd-EOB-DTPAHepatocellular carcinomaMachine learningRecurrence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.