ArticleClinical oral investigations2025
Multi-objective optimization for enhanced digitalization in direct 3D printing: an application in dentistry.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to mitigate variances between scanned STL files and original models to limit divergence from reference files and ensure dental appliance manufacture accuracy. The study also attempts to optimize STL mesh triangles to improve digital model quality and detail while balancing memory usage and accuracy. It also examines how external factors like scan distance (SD), scan angle (SA), and light intensity (LI) affect STL file quality and accuracy. The research also optimizes scanning parameters utilizing a multi-objective optimization approach to find the optimal combination of SD, SA, and LI to minimize deviation, triangles and time consumed altogether, improving 3D printing efficiency and accuracy. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn optimal combination for experiments is developed using response surface methodology with varying ranges of SD, SA, and LI to generate 20 runs. The study used a denture to develop scanned STL files at these different parametric combinations, evaluating the resulting output deviation, number of triangles and time. Predictive model for deviation is then created and processed using the multi-objective Non- dominated sorting Genetic algorithm II to minimize deviation, triangles and time consumed.
resultsThe results of the study demonstrate the significance of the developed model for deviation only using regression and for all three using ANN. As indicated by ANOVA analysis revealing a p-value less than 0.05, affirming regression model statistical significance. Optimization results states SD of 5.3621 inch, SA 82.1746 degree and LI 15.2456 W/m
conclusionsThe accuracy of file is heavily contingent upon the quality of the STL mesh derived from the process. This mesh typically requires preprocessing due to its unorganized structure, which not only compromises accuracy but also incurs additional time due to inefficiencies in mesh structure. Furthermore, while increasing the number of triangles in the mesh provides higher resolution and accuracy, it also demands greater memory allocation. Thus, achieving a balance between memory usage and the number of triangles is imperative. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Direct 3D printing streamlines dental fabrication by using patient-specific scanned STL files to create dental appliances. This method saves time, improves efficiency, and eliminates multi-stage cast generation. The scanned STL files, originally produced from point cloud data processed by surface reconstruction, must be accurate. Unorganized STL meshes require preprocessing, which reduces accuracy and increases time. Adding mesh triangles improves resolution and accuracy, but it requires more memory. Thus, memory utilization and triangle count must be balanced with time consumed. Fixing these issues provides high-quality, accurate dental restorations, increasing patient outcomes and digital dentistry. Additionally, it provides practioners to develop freedom constraints devices with more effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40214676What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.