Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40214650›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2025

Switching antipsychotics versus continued current treatment in people with non-responsive schizophrenia.

Myrto T Samara, Elisabeth Kottmaier, Bartosz Helfer, Claudia Leucht, Nikos G Christodoulou, Maximilian Huhn, Philipp H Rothe, Johannes Schneider-Thoma, Stefan Leucht

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Schizophrenia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Myrto T SamaraDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Elisabeth KottmaierDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Bartosz HelferInstitute of Psychology, University of Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland.
Claudia LeuchtMax-Planck-Institut of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany.
Nikos G ChristodoulouDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.
Maximilian HuhnDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Philipp H RotheKbo-Inn-Salzach-Klinikum, Departement for Psychosis disorders and Personality disorders, Wasserburg (Inn), Germany.
Johannes Schneider-ThomaDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Stefan LeuchtDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany people with schizophrenia do not respond to an initially prescribed antipsychotic drug. In such cases, one treatment strategy could be to switch to a different antipsychotic drug.

objectivesTo examine the effects of switching antipsychotic drugs in treating people with schizophrenia who have not responded to initial antipsychotic treatment. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (to December 2022). We inspected the references of all included studies for further relevant trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing switching to a different antipsychotic drug rather than continuing treatment with the same antipsychotic drug for people with schizophrenia who did not respond to their initial antipsychotic treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: At least two review authors independently extracted data. The primary outcomes were: clinically relevant response as defined by study authors; tolerability (participants leaving the study early due to adverse effects); and quality of life assessed by the change score in the 36-Item Short Form survey. We analysed dichotomous data using the risk ratio (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). We analysed continuous data using mean differences (MD) and corresponding 95% CI. We assessed the risk of bias of the included studies and used GRADE to evaluate the certainty of evidence for the following outcomes: clinically relevant response, tolerability (leaving the study early due to adverse effects), quality of life score change, acceptability (leaving the study early for any reason), general mental state (average change in general mental state scores), duration of hospitalisation, and number of participants experiencing at least one adverse effect. MAIN

resultsWe included 10 RCTs with 997 participants in the review. Nine studies used a parallel design, and one used a cross-over design. Seven studies were double-blind, two were single-blind and one did not provide any detail regarding blinding. All studies included people who were non-responsive to ongoing antipsychotic treatment. The minimum duration of the ongoing antipsychotic treatment ranged from three days to two years. The length of the comparison phase varied from two weeks to six months. The studies were published between 1993 and 2022. In about half of the studies, the methods of randomisation, allocation and blinding were poorly reported. The evidence is very uncertain regarding the effect of switching antipsychotics on clinically relevant response (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.77 to 2.03; I² = 43%; 7 studies, 693 participants), quality of life (MD -1.30, 95% CI -3.44 to 0.84; 1 study, 188 participants), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score change (MD -0.92, 95% CI -4.69 to 2.86; I² = 47%; 6 studies, 777 participants), duration of hospitalisation (in days) (MD 9.19, 95% CI -8.93 to 27.31; I² = 0%; 2 studies, 34 participants) and the number of people experiencing at least one adverse effect (RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.81 to 2.05; I² = 36%; 3 studies, 412 participants). Compared to continuing current treatment, switching antipsychotics may result in little to no difference in tolerability, defined as the number of participants leaving the study early due to adverse effects (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.24 to 2.26; I² = 31%; 6 studies, 672 participants; low-certainty evidence) and leaving the study early for any reason (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.17; I² = 0%; 6 studies, 672 participants; low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS'

conclusionsThis review synthesises currently available RCT evidence on switching antipsychotics versus continuing the same antipsychotic in individuals with schizophrenia who did not respond to their initial treatment. Overall, the evidence remains highly uncertain regarding the effects of either strategy on efficacy and safety outcomes, and no definitive recommendations can currently be made. There is an urgent need for larger, well-designed trials to identify the optimal treatment strategy for these cases.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsDrug SubstitutionSchizophreniaSchizophrenia, Treatment-ResistantBiasHumansQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID40214650
PMCPMC11988422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.