Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40214504›Full record

ReviewCells2025

FAAH Modulators from Natural Sources: A Collection of New Potential Drugs.

Catalin Nicoara, Filomena Fezza, Mauro Maccarrone

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Nutrients · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Catalin NicoaraDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio, Coppito, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.
Filomena FezzaDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Via Montpellier 1, 00121 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2263-2909
Mauro MaccarroneDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio, Coppito, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3990-2963

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The endocannabinoid system (ECS) plays a crucial role in maintaining homeostasis by regulating immune response, energy metabolism, cognitive functions, and neuronal activity. It consists of endocannabinoids (eCBs), cannabinoid receptors (CBRs), and enzymes involved in eCB biosynthesis and degradation. Increasing evidence highlights the involvement of the ECS under several pathological conditions, making it a promising therapeutic target. Recent research efforts have focused on modulating endogenous eCB levels, particularly through the inhibition of fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), the main catabolic enzyme of the major eCB anandamide. Natural substances, including plant extracts and purified compounds, can inhibit FAAH and represent a promising area of pharmacological research. Natural FAAH inhibitors are particularly attractive due to their potentially lower toxicity compared to synthetic compounds, making them safer candidates for therapeutic applications. Phytocannabinoids, flavonoids, and flavolignans have been shown to efficiently inhibit FAAH. The structural diversity and bioactivity of these natural substances provide a valuable alternative to synthetic inhibitors, and may open new avenues for developing innovative pharmacological tools.

Indexed as

AmidohydrolasesBiological ProductsEnzyme InhibitorsAnimalsEndocannabinoidsFatty Acid Amide HydrolasesHumansAmidohydrolasesBiological ProductsEndocannabinoidsEnzyme InhibitorsFatty Acid Amide Hydrolasescannabinoidsendocannabinoid systemFAAHinhibitorsnatural compounds

Identifiers

PMID40214504
PMCPMC11989041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.