SynthesisCells2025
Effectiveness of Stem Cell Secretomes in the Regeneration and Functional Recovery of Severed Nerves in Patients with Nerve Injuries: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-omics technologies: Novel tools and methods for assessing nerve injury and regeneration.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Dual-Modality Bioactive Repair of Facial Nerve Injury Using PEG-Mediated Axonal Fusion and Extracellular Vesicles-Enriched Human GMSC Secretome.Research square · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The regenerative potential of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) secretomes in peripheral nerve injuries warrants rigorous evaluation. This systematic review analyzes their effectiveness in preclinical models of neurotmesis, a complete transection of a nerve. Neurophysiological recovery was assessed through nerve conduction velocity (NCV), a measure of the speed at which electrical impulses travel along a nerve. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect (last search July 2024). From 640 initially identified studies, 13 met inclusion criteria, encompassing 514 animals (rats). experimental designs published since 2014 in English or Spanish, focusing on MSC secretomes for nerve regeneration. Exclusion criteria included reviews, case reports, and incomplete data. The risk of bias was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Results were synthesized narratively, focusing on functional and structural outcomes. The included studies employed various MSC sources, including adipose tissue, olfactory mucosa, and umbilical cord. Nine studies reported enhanced SFI, favoring secretome-treated groups over controls (mean difference +20.5%,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.