ArticleCells2025
Simulation and Quantitative Analysis of Spatial Centromere Distribution Patterns.
Article in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- VPS4 and CHMP7 release centromeres from the nuclear envelope for post-mitotic positioning in daughter nuclei.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- FUS and TAF15 safeguard the critical functions of the ribonucleoprotein network formed by EWSR1 and newly synthesized RNA.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A prominent feature of eukaryotic chromosomes are centromeres, which are specialized regions of repetitive DNA required for faithful chromosome segregation during cell division. In interphase cells, centromeres are non-randomly positioned in the three-dimensional space of the nucleus in a cell type-specific manner. The functional relevance and the cellular mechanisms underlying this localization are unknown, and quantitative methods to measure distribution patterns of centromeres in 3D space are needed. Here, we developed an analytical framework that combines sensitive clustering metrics and advanced modeling techniques for the quantitative analysis of centromere distributions at the single-cell level. To identify a robust quantitative measure for centromere clustering, we benchmarked six metrics for their ability to sensitively detect changes in centromere distribution patterns from high-throughput imaging data of human cells, both under normal conditions and upon experimental perturbation of centromere distribution. We found that Ripley's K function has the highest accuracy with minimal sensitivity to variations in the number of centromeres, making it the most suitable metric for measuring centromere distributions. As a complementary approach, we also developed and validated spatial models to replicate centromere distribution patterns, and we show that a radially shifted Gaussian distribution best represents the centromere patterns seen in human cells. Our approach creates tools for the quantitative characterization of spatial centromere distributions with applications in both targeted studies of centromere organization and unbiased screening approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.