ArticleJournal of synchrotron radiation2025
Machine learning for orbit steering in the presence of nonlinearities.
Article in Journal of synchrotron radiation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Circular particle accelerators require precise beam orbit correction to maintain the beam's trajectory close to the ideal `golden orbit', which is centered within all magnetic elements of the ring, except for slight deviations due to installed experiments. Traditionally, this correction is achieved using methodologies based on the response matrix (RM). The RM elements remain constant when the accelerator's lattice includes solely linear elements or when a linear approximation is valid for small perturbations, allowing for the calculation of corrector strengths to steer the beam. However, most circular accelerators contain nonlinear magnets, leading to variations in RM elements when the beam experiences large perturbations, rendering traditional methods less effective and necessitating multiple iterations for convergence. To address these challenges, a machine learning (ML)-based approach is explored for beam orbit correction. This approach, applied to synchrotron SLS 2.0 under construction at the Paul Scherrer Institut, is evaluated against and in combination with the standard RM-based method under various conditions. A possible limitation of ML for this application is the potential change in the dimensionality of the ML model after optimization, which could affect performance. A solution to this issue is proposed, improving the robustness and appeal of the ML-based method for efficient beam orbit steering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.