ArticlePediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society
Optimizing risk factors to guide COST-effective use of palivizumab in KOREAN infants.
Article in Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimizing risk factors to guide COST-effective use of palivizumab in KOREAN infants.Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundKorean infants born at 32-35 weeks gestational age (wGA) receive palivizumab prophylaxis to prevent respiratory syncytial virus hospitalization (RSVH) if they are born during the RSV season and have a sibling. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of using the International Risk Scoring Tool (IRST) to target prophylaxis in Korea.
methodsThe IRST includes 3 risk factors: birth 3 months before to 2 months after the RSV season starts; smokers in the household and/or smoking while pregnant; and, siblings/daycare. First, the accuracy of the Korean guidelines to predict RSVH was compared to that of the IRST using a historic dataset of 13,475 infants born 32-35 wGA. Second, a published cost-utility model was adapted using Korean-specific parameters for costs (2022) and resource use to assess the cost-effectiveness of palivizumab versus no prophylaxis guided either by the Korean guidelines or the IRST.
resultsUsing the Korean guidelines identified 26.9% of RSVHs, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.512. The corresponding results for infants assessed at moderate- to high-risk by the IRST were 85.1% and 0.773, respectively. The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) for prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis was ₩29,674,102 (USD22,977) using the Korean guidelines, with a 67.0% probability for cost-effectiveness against a willingness-to-pay threshold of ₩41,655,203 (USD32,255). For the IRST, it was ₩26,265,142 (USD20,338)/QALY and 70.8% probability.
conclusionsAdoption of the IRST in Korea would provide greater protection of the most vulnerable infants born 32-35 wGA against RSVH whilst improving cost-effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.