Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40214169›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2025

The effect of different proximities to failure on arterial stiffness following resistance training protocols matched for volume-load.

Eleftherios Karanasios, Scott Hannah, Helen Ryan-Stewart, James Faulkner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eleftherios KaranasiosSchool of Sport, Health and Community, Faculty of Health & Wellbeing, University of Winchester, Winchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0753-4844
Scott HannahSchool of Sport, Health and Community, Faculty of Health & Wellbeing, University of Winchester, Winchester, UK.
Helen Ryan-StewartSchool of Health and Sport Science, Faculty of Education, Humanities and Health Science, Eastern Institute of Technology, Napier, New Zealand.
James FaulknerSchool of Sport, Health and Community, Faculty of Health & Wellbeing, University of Winchester, Winchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compared acute changes in measures of arterial stiffness (AS) between two resistance training (RT) protocols that were load, volume and rest matched, but differed in intensity of effort. Eleven healthy adults (36.4 ± 6.8 years) performed a RT protocol with high intensity of effort (HE) and a RT protocol with low intensity of effort (LE). The HE protocol consisted of 3 sets of 12 repetitions, while the LE comprised of 6 sets of 6 repetitions. Loading intensity, volume load, and total rest duration were equivalent between the RT sessions. Pulse wave velocity, augmentation index values collected at baseline, immediately post and 15 min post-exercise. HE elicited significantly greater increases in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (6.4 ± 0.3 to 7.3 ± 0.5 m/s) when compared to LE (6.6 ± 0.3 to 6.7 ± 0.3 m/s) (p < 0.05). Both HE and LE induced significant increases in augmentation index (13 ± 5.6 to 28.1 ± 9.3%) post exercise (all p < 0.05). These findings demonstrate that RT with a lower intensity of effort attenuate increases in measures of arterial stiffness compared to a RT scheme at higher intensity of effort when volume load and total rest are equalized.

Indexed as

Resistance TrainingVascular StiffnessAdultFemaleHumansMalePulse Wave Analysisarterial stiffnessproximity to failurepulse wave velocityresistance training

Identifiers

PMID40214169
PMCPMC11987043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.