ArticleParasite (Paris, France)2025
No evidence of Alzheimer's disease pathology in mice infected with Toxocara canis.
Article in Parasite (Paris, France), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Toxocariasis as an Elderly Zoonosis: Seroprevalence, Neurocognitive Assessment, and Associated Risk Factors in Persons 50 Years and Older.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The potential link between the infections and the development of Alzheimer's disease (AD) has led to speculations about the role of various pathogens in triggering amyloid-β (Aβ) overproduction, possibly leading to AD onset. The globally distributed dog roundworm Toxocara canis was suggested to be a suitable candidate due to neurotropism of the larvae and infection chronicity. This study investigated whether chronic T. canis infection induces AD-like pathology in mice and whether Aβ is toxic to T. canis. BALB/c and APP/PS1 transgenic mice, which overproduce Aβ, were infected with T. canis L3 larvae and monitored for larval burden, Aβ accumulation, and behavioral changes. In vitro tests of recombinant Aβ toxicity against the larvae were also performed. Despite the presence of T. canis larvae in the central nervous system 8 and 16 weeks post-infection, no significant increase in Aβ concentration or AD-related behavioral alterations were observed. Aβ was detected on the surface and within the intestines of T. canis larvae, but in vitro exposure to recombinant Aβ did not affect larval viability or morphology. Our findings suggest that T. canis infection does not trigger AD-like pathology in mice, and Aβ does not act as an antiparasitic agent. This challenges the emerging hypothesis that chronic neurotoxocarosis infections may contribute to AD development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.