ArticleJournal of global health2025
Infectious disease forecasting to support public health: use of readily available methods to predict malaria and diarrhoeal diseases in Mozambique.
Article in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The use of artificial intelligence based modelling techniques in One Health-related infectious disease studies in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Pooled it
- Recent advances in machine learning and Bayesian modeling for tropical disease prediction, diagnosis, and risk analysis: a scoping review.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Mozambique faces a high burden of infectious diseases but currently has limited capacity for forecasting disease incidence. Recent improvements in disease surveillance through the National Monitoring and Evaluation System now provide weekly reports of disease incidence across the country's districts. This study focuses on using these records, specifically for malaria and diarrhoeal diseases, which together account for approximately 40% of deaths among children under five, to develop statistical forecasts and evaluate their accuracy. Methods: We utilised a Python library for time series forecasting called Darts, which includes a variety of statistical forecasting models. Three models were selected for this analysis: Exponential Smoothing (a classical statistical model), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (a machine-learning model), and Neural Hierarchical Interpolation for Time Series (a neural network-based model). Retrospective forecasts were generated and compared across multiple forecast horizons. We evaluated both point and probabilistic forecast accuracy for individual models and two types of model ensembles, comparing the results to forecasts based on historical expectance. Results: All models consistently outperformed forecasts based on historical expectance for both malaria and diarrhoeal disease across forecast horizons of up to eight weeks, with comparable or better performance at 16 weeks. The most accurate forecasts were achieved using a weighted ensemble of the models. Conclusions: This study highlights the potential of using a readily available tool for generating accurate disease forecasts. It represents a step toward scalable and accessible forecasting solutions that can enhance disease surveillance and public health responses, not only in Mozambique but also in other low- and middle-income countries with similar challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.