ArticleEarly intervention in psychiatry2025
Implementation of Transdiagnostic Psychosocial Group Interventions and a Novel Peer Work Role in a Community Youth Mental Health Setting.
Article in Early intervention in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsGroup interventions can be an appropriate care option for young people with mental ill-health, yet there is a lack of research on their implementation within real-world settings. This paper aimed to explore the feasibility and acceptability of group interventions and a Group Coordinator peer work role in a community mental health service and the perspectives of young people, carers and staff on implementation.
methodsA retrospective chart audit of 121 referrals to group interventions from January 2022 to June 2023 was conducted. Education, demographic and administrative data were collected to explore feasibility and acceptability. Survey data from 44 young people who participated was also used to explore acceptability. Semi-structured interviews (8 young people, 7 carers and 11 staff) explored perspectives on implementation, mapping barriers and facilitators to domains of the Comprehensive Framework for Implementation Research.
resultsReferrals made before the young person was involved in mental health treatment (i.e., at the stage of assessment) were less likely to result in engagement in a group, suggesting limited feasibility as a standalone care option. Young people reported overall positive experiences of group interventions, though attrition rates and qualitative interviews indicate they are perceived as less acceptable than individual options. The Group Coordinator role was viewed by staff as key to sustainability, with multiple benefits.
conclusionsThe current paper contributes to the scant literature on the implementation of group interventions with several practical implications for service planning. Further studies are needed to examine the implementation in other contexts, explore within-treatment variables and incorporate clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.