Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40214104›Full record

ArticleEarly intervention in psychiatry2025

Implementation of Transdiagnostic Psychosocial Group Interventions and a Novel Peer Work Role in a Community Youth Mental Health Setting.

Oliver Ardill-Young, Scott Teasdale, Paul Rich, Antonia Ottavio, Benjamin Lueck, Louise Treen, Michael Hodgins, Jackie Curtis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Early intervention in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Oliver Ardill-YoungDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of new South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7983-6999
Scott TeasdaleDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of new South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6769-8421
Paul RichSouth Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Antonia OttavioSouth Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8307-6200
Benjamin LueckSouth Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Louise TreenSouth Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Michael HodginsPopulation Child Health Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of new South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9177-3428
Jackie CurtisDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of new South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6884-0098

Funding

Australian Government
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsGroup interventions can be an appropriate care option for young people with mental ill-health, yet there is a lack of research on their implementation within real-world settings. This paper aimed to explore the feasibility and acceptability of group interventions and a Group Coordinator peer work role in a community mental health service and the perspectives of young people, carers and staff on implementation.

methodsA retrospective chart audit of 121 referrals to group interventions from January 2022 to June 2023 was conducted. Education, demographic and administrative data were collected to explore feasibility and acceptability. Survey data from 44 young people who participated was also used to explore acceptability. Semi-structured interviews (8 young people, 7 carers and 11 staff) explored perspectives on implementation, mapping barriers and facilitators to domains of the Comprehensive Framework for Implementation Research.

resultsReferrals made before the young person was involved in mental health treatment (i.e., at the stage of assessment) were less likely to result in engagement in a group, suggesting limited feasibility as a standalone care option. Young people reported overall positive experiences of group interventions, though attrition rates and qualitative interviews indicate they are perceived as less acceptable than individual options. The Group Coordinator role was viewed by staff as key to sustainability, with multiple benefits.

conclusionsThe current paper contributes to the scant literature on the implementation of group interventions with several practical implications for service planning. Further studies are needed to examine the implementation in other contexts, explore within-treatment variables and incorporate clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Community Mental Health ServicesMental DisordersPeer GroupPsychosocial InterventionPsychotherapy, GroupAdolescentAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMalePatient Acceptance of Health CareRetrospective StudiesYoung Adultadolescentfeasibility studiesgroup therapyimplementationmental healthqualitative researchtransdiagnostic

Identifiers

PMID40214104
PMCPMC11987487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.