ReviewJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2025
Functional Pulmonary Imaging.
Review in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility and SNR Performance of HyperpolarizedMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Editorial for "Automated Ultrashort Echo Time (UTE) MRI Low Signal Volume Analysis in Stable Pediatric Cystic Fibrosis and After Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor Therapy".Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Multinuclear NMR and MRI Beyond Proton Imaging: Principles, Contrast Mechanisms, and Applications in Materials and Biomedicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Acute and 14-day effects of tiotropium/olodaterol on cardiopulmonary function in COPD.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- EIT Outperforms Quantitative CT in Stratifying ARDS Severity After Lung Transplantation: A Retrospective Study.The clinical respiratory journal · 2025Article
- Functional Pulmonary Imaging.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aging of the world population gave rise to an increased prevalence of many lung diseases, with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease now ranking as the third-leading cause of death according to the World Health Organization. To diagnose lung disease, a thorough assessment of lung function is essential since it may reveal unique signatures in terms of disease pathophysiology. Yet, clinically established lung function tests are global measurements, which may compromise their sensitivity to early, regional changes in lung function compared to spatially resolved imaging tests. From a scientific perspective, the lung is a highly complex organ, and newly developed functional imaging methods may elucidate previously unknown aspects of its physiology. Functional pulmonary imaging is and will thus be of great value for both clinical and research applications. The goal of this review is to shed light on the field of functional pulmonary imaging in all its varieties, with a particular focus on the numerous tools MRI has to offer. This includes
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.