Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40213962›Full record

ReviewEcology letters2025

Secondary Sympatry as a Sorting Process.

Sean A S Anderson, Daniel R Matute

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ecology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sean A S AndersonSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3955-5313
Daniel R MatuteDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Drivers and consequences of introgression in evolutionR35GM148244 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Daniel Matute · 2023 to 2026
$2.2M
Georgia Institute of TechnologyNIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM148244NIGMS NIH HHS R35GM148244
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A much remarked-upon pattern in nature is elevated trait disparity in sympatric relative to allopatric populations or species. Early explanations focused on secondary contact between allopatrically speciating taxa and emphasised adaptive divergence driven by costly interactions in sympatry (i.e., 'character displacement'). Here we consider a related hypothesis, 'species sorting', which describes a bias in the outcome of secondary contact wherein lineages are unlikely to establish sympatry unless and until they evolve sufficient trait differences in allopatry. Sorting-like processes are prevalent in community assembly theory but are more seldom discussed in the context of speciation and secondary sympatry. We first define ecological and reproductive species sorting as analogous to ecological and reproductive character displacement, and we synthesise 'differential fusion' and the 'Templeton effect' within this framework. Through the logic of coexistence and assembly theories, we distinguish the types of allopatry-derived trait differences that will likely promote sympatry from those that likely will not, and we discuss biogeographic consequences of the latter. We then highlight new empirical approaches to distinguish sorting from displacement and survey the mixed evidence to-date. We finally suggest key priorities for future research into the hypothesized role of species sorting as a generator of major biodiversity patterns.

Indexed as

Genetic SpeciationSympatryAnimalsBiodiversityBiological EvolutionEcosystemModels, Biologicalcharacter displacementcoexistencereinforcementspeciationspecies sortingsympatry

Identifiers

PMID40213962
PMCPMC11987058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.