ArticleCureus2025
Effects of Long-Term Chatbot System Use on Healthcare Professionals' Professional Identity Formation and Stress: A Small-Scale Comparative Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Digital mental health interventions, including chatbot systems, are increasingly recognized for their potential to address mental health challenges among healthcare professionals. In particular, reflective practices facilitated by chatbots may support identity development and alleviate stress. However, the long-term effects of such interventions remain underexplored. Objective This study investigated the effects of a chatbot system using the line chart method over approximately nine months on the professional identity development and stress levels of healthcare professionals in Japan. Methods Professional identity formation specifically refers to how healthcare professionals perceive, develop, and integrate their professional roles and responsibilities into their self-concept. To evaluate this construct and associated stress levels, a parallel-group design was employed, in which eight participants (nurses and physical therapists) were randomly allocated to either a system-use group (Group A) or a non-use group (Group B). Both groups were followed for nine months, with periodic assessments conducted before and after the intervention, as well as after a washout period. The Japanese version of the Dimensions of Identity Development Scale (DIDS-J), assessing Commitment Formation, Identification with Commitment, Broad Exploration, Deep Exploration, and Ruminative Exploration, and the Public Health Research Foundation Stress Checklist Short Form (PHRF-SCL), evaluating Anxiety/Uncertainty, Fatigue/Physical Responses, Autonomic Symptoms, and Depressive Mood/Inadequacy, were administered. Results In the between-group comparisons, Group A demonstrated statistically significant improvements compared to Group B in the DIDS-J subscales, including Commitment Formation (16.5±0.6 vs. 14.0±0.8), Identification with Commitment (16.5±0.6 vs. 14.3±1.0), Broad Exploration (18.0±0.8 vs. 15.0±0.8), and Deep Exploration (18.0±1.1 vs. 14.5±1.3). Additionally, significant improvements were observed in the PHRF-SCL subscales, specifically Anxiety/Uncertainty (5.5±1.3 vs. 7.5±0.6), Fatigue/Physical Responses (4.5±0.6 vs. 7.8±1.3), and Depressive Mood/Inadequacy (4.5±1.3 vs. 9.3±0.6). Conclusion The results suggest that long-term use of a chatbot system employing reflective methods may promote professional identity development and reduce certain stress responses in healthcare professionals. Nonetheless, sample size limitations, pre-existing group differences, and environmental variables constrain the interpretation of findings. Future research with larger and more diverse populations, extended follow-up periods, and additional physiological or life-event measures is warranted to validate and refine these preliminary outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.