ArticleCureus2025
Early Outcomes After the Adoption of the Direct Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lessons from the learning curve of the direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.Musculoskeletal surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Our unit had historically performed total hip arthroplasty (THA) through either the posterior (PA) approach or the anterolateral approach (ALA). In November 2020, a group of five consultants transitioned to utilising the direct anterior approach (DAA). Appropriate training was undertaken, and cases were performed as dual consultant procedures with intraoperative radiography or robotic assistance. In this study, we aimed to determine if the learning curve of adopting the DAA approach had led to adverse outcomes when compared to the previously used PA or ALA. Methodology Outcomes were collated prospectively. These included basic demographics, intraoperative details, complication rates, and Oxford Hip Scores (OHS). The primary outcome measure was OHS. A comparison of outcomes was made across three patient groups who underwent THA either via DAA, PA, or ALA. All patients were operated on between November 2020 and September 2021. Results A total of 48 patients underwent DAA THA over one year. The mean age was 67 years and the mean American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score was 2. Over this period, 140 PA and 137 ALA THAs were performed with available data. Propensity score matching was performed on a 1:1 basis using BMI, age, sex, and ASA scores as covariates to generate a matched cohort group of conventional-approach THA (n=32). Length of stay was significantly reduced at 2.2 days (p<0.001) with DAA compared to ALA and PA. However, there was no significant difference in the length of surgery, blood loss, infection, dislocation, and periprosthetic fracture rate. There was no significant difference in OHS between any approach at three months or one year. Conclusions The transition to the DAA approach has not made a negative impact despite its associated steep learning curve and, in fact, has improved efficiency in elective surgery. Based on our findings, we recommend that those shifting to this approach receive the appropriate training in a high-volume centre and perform cases as dual consultant procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.