Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40213750›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Comparison Between the In-Hospital Outcomes of Patients Presented With Acute Anterior Wall ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction With and Without a Right Bundle Branch Block.

Muhammad Zohaib Amjad, Bushra Mumtaz, Muhammad Abubakar, Muhammad Irfan Jamil, Muhammad Awais, Adnan Ahmad Zafar, Adeel Ahmed, Hibba Tul Noor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Muhammad Zohaib AmjadInternal Medicine, Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading, GBR.
Bushra MumtazCardiology, Quaid-E-Azam Medical College, Bahawalpur, PAK.
Muhammad AbubakarCardiology, Multan Institute of Cardiology, Multan, PAK.
Muhammad Irfan JamilNephrology, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, PAK.
Muhammad AwaisMedicine, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, PAK.
Adnan Ahmad ZafarNephrology, Islam Medical College, Sialkot, PAK.
Adeel AhmedMedicine, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, PAK.
Hibba Tul NoorCardiology, Punjab Institute of Cardiology, Lahore, PAK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough a right bundle branch block (RBBB) complicates anterior wall ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (AW-STEMI), its independent prognostic significance remains understudied. MATERIAL AND

methodThis cross-sectional observational study was conducted at the Punjab Institute of Cardiology, Lahore, over a period of 18 months from January 2022 to June 2023. A total of 349 patients presenting with acute AW-STEMI were enrolled. They were stratified into RBBB and non-RBBB groups. Outcomes included mortality, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, arrhythmias, complete heart block (CHB), post-myocardial infarction (MI) angina, and hospital stay duration. The effect of confounding variables on in-hospital mortality was evaluated through stratification among the two groups.

resultsAW-STEMI with RBBB was reported in 50 (14.3%) out of 349 patients. Both groups had a similar mean age (p = 0.276), and comorbidities, including hypertension (p = 0.363), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.872), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (p = 0.299), dyslipidemia (p = 0.486), smoking status, and prior myocardial infarction (p > 0.05), were comparable. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantly lower in RBBB patients (p < 0.001). Peak troponin-I levels were significantly higher in the RBBB group (p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.581-11.803). In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in RBBB patients (16% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.009, odds ratio (OR) = 3.160, 95% CI: 1.284-7.777). Cardiogenic shock occurred more frequently in RBBB patients (36% vs. 16.4%, p = 0.003, OR = 2.672, 95% CI: 1.394-5.120). Arrhythmias were significantly higher in the RBBB group (42% vs. 19.7%, p = 0.001, OR = 2.946, 95% CI: 1.569-5.529). Cardiac arrest (16% vs. 11.4%, p = 0.354) and post-MI angina (24% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.170) were more common in RBBB patients but were not statistically significant. CHB was observed in 12% of RBBB patients vs. 8% in non-RBBB (p = 0.345). CKD was strongly associated with increased mortality, with all affected STEMI patients with RBBB experiencing fatal outcomes, whereas those without RBBB had significantly lower mortality. The choice of reperfusion strategy played a crucial role, with primary PCI demonstrating a survival benefit in RBBB patients, while thrombolysis and medical management were linked to markedly higher mortality rates in this group.

conclusionPatients with AW-STEMI and RBBB had significantly worse in-hospital outcomes, including higher mortality, increased risk of cardiogenic shock, and a greater prevalence of arrhythmias. Although cardiac arrest, post-MI angina, and CHB were more frequent in RBBB patients, these differences were not statistically significant. Primary PCI was associated with a lower mortality risk in RBBB patients.

Indexed as

in-hospital outcomemortalitypost-myocardial infarctionright bundle branch blockst-elevation myocardial infarction (stemi)

Identifiers

PMID40213750
PMCPMC11983667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.