ArticleCureus2025
Evaluation of Nasal Reconstruction With Local Flaps Using the Translated Version of the FACE-Q Scale in a Local Language.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nasal Reconstruction After Skin Cancer Excision: Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes from a Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Attaining a nasal reconstruction that is functionally and aesthetically pleasing is a challenge to many reconstructive surgeons worldwide. Since the concept of the 'subunit principle' was laid down, many advancements have been devised in nasal reconstruction, but no proper evidence-based data is yet present in the literature regarding the satisfaction amongst patients after nasal reconstruction. In this study, we have evaluated the outcome after nasal reconstruction using a local language translation of FACE-Q scales. Materials and methods A total of 23 patients were operated on for nasal reconstruction in one or two stages during the period from September 2021 to December 2022, after assessing the cause, the subunit involved, and the type of nasal defect. The FACE-Q questionnaire was administered preoperatively and six months postoperatively to assess the satisfaction with outcomes among patients. Results Fifty-one nasal defects were reconstructed in 23 patients, out of which the nasal tip was the most commonly involved subunit. The defects were resurfaced with full-thickness skin grafts, V-Y advancements, deltopectoral flaps, nasolabial flaps, axial frontonasal flaps, and paramedian forehead flaps. Almost all the patients showed a significant improvement in their FACE-Q postoperative scales after the surgeries. Conclusion Nasal reconstruction, owing to its complex anatomy, has always been a subject of discussion. Comprehensive information about the outcome of nasal reconstruction can be measured using the FACE-Q scale, which is a patient-reported outcome assessment. The evaluation will always help the surgeon in regularly assessing and improving the outcome of surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.