ArticleCureus2025
Assessing Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAP) Regarding Organ Donation Among the General Population in Perambalur, India: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Organ transplantation is a successful medical intervention available for end-stage organ failure. There is a wide gap between the need and the availability of organs.The government has begun specific, long-term initiatives to encourage organ donation, although it has not been able to come to a stage of full realisation. Objective The objective of this study is to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) regarding organ donation among the general population in Perambalur, India. Methodology This cross-sectional study was performed among the general population in Perambalur, Tamil Nadu, India, from December 2022 to February 2023. About 470 individuals were selected using the convenience sampling method. A semi-structured pro forma was used to collect the socio-demographic profile, and a questionnaire was used to assess the KAP of organ donation. The minimum and maximum scores for knowledge of organ donation were 0-13 and for attitude and practice as 0-8. The data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, IBM Corp., Version 26.0, Armonk, NY), and the categorical data were represented as frequency and percentage, whereas mean and standard deviation represent quantitative data. The chi-square test was used to investigate the relationship between sociodemographic characteristics and KAP regarding organ donation. Results A total of 470 responses were analyzed, with 57.7% males and 65.3% from rural areas. Most (84.7%) had heard of organ donation, mainly through television (78.6%). Awareness was highest for eye (89.4%), kidney (76%), and heart (71%) donation. While 83.6% supported organ donation, only 16.8% pledged, and 5% registered as donors. Adequate KAPs were seen in 34.1%, 29.1%, and 27.1% of participants, respectively. Younger age, urban residence, higher education, and upper socioeconomic class were significantly associated with better KAP scores (p=0.001). Conclusion Despite high awareness and a positive attitude toward organ donation, actual donor registration remains low. More than one-fourth of the participants had adequate KAP, influenced by factors such as younger age, urban residence, higher education, and upper socioeconomic status. Misconceptions, cultural beliefs, and religious concerns were key barriers to participation. Targeted awareness campaigns involving media, healthcare professionals, and religious scholars are crucial to increasing acceptability. Strengthening donor registration systems and policy-driven incentives can help bridge the gap between awareness and actual organ donation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.