ArticleRSC advances2025
Mechanistic insights from simulations of drug-drug conjugate nanoclusters for co-delivery across cancer cell membranes.
Article in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amphiphilic drug-drug conjugates (ADDCs) such as gemcitabine-camptothecin (GEM-CPT) and doxorubicin-10-hydroxycamptothecin (DOX-HCPT) nanoclusters offer innovative solutions to overcome the limitations of conventional cancer therapies, including poor solubility and nonspecific targeting. Using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, we explored the mechanisms by which these nanoclusters interact with and penetrate cancer and normal cell membranes. GEM-CPT exhibited enhanced membrane penetration in cancer cells through combined hydrophilic and hydrophobic interactions, along with its ability to extract cholesterol and induce membrane remodelling. In contrast, DOX-HCPT maintained structural integrity through stable π-π stacking interactions, showing selective binding to membrane head groups (HG) with minimal cholesterol interaction, particularly in normal membranes. The GEM-CPT nanocluster disrupted the cancer membrane by inducing asymmetric lipid distribution and facilitating water infiltration, whereas the hydrophobic DOX-HCPT repelled water, maintaining membrane stability. The size of the nanocluster further influenced the behaviour; larger clusters drove steric assembly and lipid reorganisation, while smaller clusters achieved deeper penetration at the cost of structural integrity. The contrasting behaviours of GEM-CPT and DOX-HCPT highlight the critical roles of size, charge, and amphiphilicity in membrane transport mechanisms. These findings provide valuable insights into the design of efficient and selective nanomedicines, paving the way for optimised drug delivery systems with reduced off-target effects.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.