Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40213605›Full record

ArticleSmall science2023

Filament-Based Melt Electrowriting Enables Dual-Mode Additive Manufacturing for Multiscale Constructs.

Kilian Maria Arthur Mueller, Annika Hangleiter, Sarah Burkhardt, Diana Marcela Rojas-González, Christina Kwade, Sebastian Tobias Pammer, Stefan Leonhardt, Petra Mela

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Small science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Advances in melt electrowriting for cardiovascular applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kilian Maria Arthur MuellerChair of Medical Materials and Implants Department of Mechanical Engineering TUM School of Engineering and Design Munich Institute of Biomedical Engineering Technical University of Munich Boltzmannstraße 15 85748 Garching Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0141-2467
Annika HangleiterChair of Medical Materials and Implants Department of Mechanical Engineering TUM School of Engineering and Design Munich Institute of Biomedical Engineering Technical University of Munich Boltzmannstraße 15 85748 Garching Germany.
Sarah BurkhardtChair of Medical Materials and Implants Department of Mechanical Engineering TUM School of Engineering and Design Munich Institute of Biomedical Engineering Technical University of Munich Boltzmannstraße 15 85748 Garching Germany.
Diana Marcela Rojas-GonzálezChair of Medical Materials and Implants Department of Mechanical Engineering TUM School of Engineering and Design Munich Institute of Biomedical Engineering Technical University of Munich Boltzmannstraße 15 85748 Garching Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1260-7593
Christina KwadeChair of Medical Materials and Implants Department of Mechanical Engineering TUM School of Engineering and Design Munich Institute of Biomedical Engineering Technical University of Munich Boltzmannstraße 15 85748 Garching Germany.
Sebastian Tobias PammerKumovis GmbH Flößergasse 4 81369 München Germany.
Stefan LeonhardtKumovis GmbH Flößergasse 4 81369 München Germany.
Petra MelaChair of Medical Materials and Implants Department of Mechanical Engineering TUM School of Engineering and Design Munich Institute of Biomedical Engineering Technical University of Munich Boltzmannstraße 15 85748 Garching Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6503-076X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melt electrowriting (MEW) is an electric-field-assisted fiber-forming biofabrication strategy for the additive manufacturing (AM) of precisely defined 3D microarchitectures. MEW is based on pressure-driven extrusion of a polymer melt pool, currently mainly implemented at laboratory scale with specialized machine technology and limited to only few materials. This precludes the accessibility of MEW to a broader user group and can become the bottleneck of MEW's technological advancement. In contrast to conventional MEW, a filament-based approach (F-MEW) is introduced that exploits the technological ecosystem of fused filament fabrication (FFF), a globally used transformative AM technique. In this work, a polymer filament serves as feedstock material and is melted just on demand. By upgrading existing FFF systems, MEW of polymer microfibers is enabled, as validated with polycaprolactone (PCL) and demonstrated with direct writing of thermosensitive polydioxanone (PDO). Finally, FFF and F-MEW are hybridized in a dual-mode AM process. This enables multiscale constructs featuring both FFF struts and one order of magnitude smaller F-MEW microfibers. This work opens the accessibility of F-MEW to the large FFF user group, potentially benefitting from the plethora of filaments available for FFF, while, at the same time, expanding the FFF fabrication window.

Indexed as

biofabricationfused filament fabricationhybridsmelt electrowritingmultiscale

Identifiers

PMID40213605
PMCPMC11935881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.