Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40213580›Full record

ArticleSmall science2024

Nanoscintillator Coating: A Key Parameter That Strongly Impacts Internalization, Biocompatibility, and Therapeutic Efficacy in Pancreatic Cancer Models.

Clémentine Aubrun Fulbert, Frédéric Chaput, Sarah Stelse-Masson, Maxime Henry, Benoit Chovelon, Sylvain Bohic, Dennis Brueckner, Jan Garrevoet, Christine Moriscot, Benoit Gallet and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Small science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Clémentine Aubrun FulbertUniversité Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, UA 07 Synchrotron Radiation for Biomedicine Grenoble France.
Frédéric ChaputUniversité de Lyon Laboratoire de Chimie, École Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS UMR 5182 46 Allée d'Italie F69364 Lyon France.
Sarah Stelse-MassonUniversité Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, UA 07 Synchrotron Radiation for Biomedicine Grenoble France.
Maxime HenryUniversité Grenoble Alpes INSERM U 1209, CNRS UMR 5309, Team Cancer Targets and Experimental Therapeutics, Institute for Advanced Biosciences 38000 Grenoble France.
Benoit ChovelonUniversité Grenoble Alpes Département de Pharmacochimie Moléculaire, CNRS, UMR 5063 F-38041 Grenoble France.
Sylvain BohicUniversité Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, UA 07 Synchrotron Radiation for Biomedicine Grenoble France.
Dennis BruecknerDeutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY Notkestr. 85 22607 Hamburg Germany.
Jan GarrevoetDeutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY Notkestr. 85 22607 Hamburg Germany.
Christine MoriscotUniversité Grenoble Alpes EMBL, Integrated Structural Biology Grenoble (ISBG), UAR 3518, CNRS, CEA 71 avenue des Martyrs F-38042 Grenoble France.
Benoit GalletUniversité Grenoble Alpes Institut de Biologie Structurale (IBS), CEA, CNRS 38000 Grenoble France.
Julien VollaireUniversité Grenoble Alpes INSERM U 1209, CNRS UMR 5309, Team Cancer Targets and Experimental Therapeutics, Institute for Advanced Biosciences 38000 Grenoble France.
Olivier NicoudUniversité Grenoble Alpes INSERM U 1209, CNRS UMR 5309, Team Cancer Targets and Experimental Therapeutics, Institute for Advanced Biosciences 38000 Grenoble France.
Frédéric LerougeUniversité de Lyon Laboratoire de Chimie, École Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS UMR 5182 46 Allée d'Italie F69364 Lyon France.
Sandrine Denis-QuanquinUniversité Lyon 1 Centre Technologique des Microstructures F-69622 Villeurbanne France.
Xavier JaurandUniversité Lyon 1 Centre Technologique des Microstructures F-69622 Villeurbanne France.
Thibault JacquetUniversité Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, UA 07 Synchrotron Radiation for Biomedicine Grenoble France.
Anthony NomezineUniversité Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, UA 07 Synchrotron Radiation for Biomedicine Grenoble France.
Véronique JosserandUniversité Grenoble Alpes INSERM U 1209, CNRS UMR 5309, Team Cancer Targets and Experimental Therapeutics, Institute for Advanced Biosciences 38000 Grenoble France.
Jean-Luc CollUniversité Grenoble Alpes INSERM U 1209, CNRS UMR 5309, Team Cancer Targets and Experimental Therapeutics, Institute for Advanced Biosciences 38000 Grenoble France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2453-3552
Jean-Luc RavanatUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CEA, CNRS, Grenoble INP, SyMMES UMR 5819 F-38000 Grenoble France.
Hélène ElleaumeUniversité Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, UA 07 Synchrotron Radiation for Biomedicine Grenoble France.
Anne-Laure BulinUniversité Grenoble Alpes INSERM U 1209, CNRS UMR 5309, Team Cancer Targets and Experimental Therapeutics, Institute for Advanced Biosciences 38000 Grenoble France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2644-8626

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is associated with a poor prognosis despite multimodal treatments. To improve the efficacy of radiotherapy, the use of nanoscintillators is emerging. Made of high-Z elements, they absorb X-rays more efficiently than tissues and can locally enhance the radiation dose provided they have accumulated near tumor cells. This study focuses on the role of the coating, a key parameter that controls both in vitro and in vivo properties of nanoparticles, including their internalization, biocompatibility, and therapeutic efficacy. Polyethylene glycol and tripolyphosphate molecules are used to coat lanthanum fluoride nanoscintillators, and their properties are evaluated on pancreatic cancer models. The experiments demonstrate a higher internalization of the nanoparticles when coated with tripolyphosphate, in both 2D and 3D culture models, correlating with greater efficacy under X-rays, which may be associated with higher radiation dose-enhancement. The nanoparticles are also injected intravenously in healthy or tumor-bearing mice in order to study their toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and biodistribution. Despite a strong liver and spleen accumulation, especially for the tripolyphosphate-coated nanoparticles, no toxicity is observed for either coating. Because they show promising radiation dose-enhancement in vitro in both culture models and a limited toxicity in vivo, polyethylene glycol-coated nanoparticles are good candidates for biomedical applications.

Indexed as

biocompatibilitynanoparticle functionalizationnanoscintillatorspancreatic cancerradiation dose‐enhancementradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID40213580
PMCPMC11935242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.