ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Differences in the inflammatory response and outcome among hospitalized patients during different waves of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- An interpretable machine learning tool for rheumatoid arthritis screening: integrating novel cellular morphological parameters with routine blood count indices.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Cytokine Dynamics in Severe COVID-19 vs. Influenza A Elderly Patients: A Prospective Comparative Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index and Risk of Diabetes and Prediabetes Two Years Post-COVID-19: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2026Article
- NLPR as a predictor of poor prognosis in patients with severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome: a prospective longitudinal study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a model for early prediction of severe/critical COVID-19 in elderly patients.PeerJ · 2026Article
- First-trimester pan-immune-inflammation value predicts preeclampsia in a dose-dependent linear pattern.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Kidney involvement and anemia in COVID-19 infection.World journal of nephrology · 2025Review
- Association Between the C-Reactive Protein-Albumin-Lymphocyte Index and Endometriosis: Insights from the 1999-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- The deadly triple M (mistrust, misinformation, and missed opportunities): understanding Romania's COVID-19 vaccination campaign and its lasting impact on public health.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in inflammatory biomarkers and their association with outcomes in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during four pandemic waves determined by different SARSCoV- 2 variants of concern. We explored if laboratory biomarkers of inflammation adjusted to patients' comorbidities, age, and vaccination status correlated with severity and mortality. Methods: A retrospective study on 8,614 consecutive hospitalized COVID-19 patients was conducted in a Romanian hospital on a 3-year interval (February 2020 to May 2023). Data collected included demographics, duration of hospitalization, comorbidities, vaccination status, COVID-19 severity, outcome, and markers of inflammation from the first blood test performed at admittance [C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, ferritin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), procalcitonin (PCT), IL-6, D-dimer, and complete blood count]. Systemic inflammatory indexes like neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-to-platelet ratio (NPR), Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII), and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) were calculated. Results: The Delta wave, characterized by the longest hospitalizations and the highest rates of severe cases and mortality, showed significant elevations in inflammatory biomarkers. CRP, fibrinogen, ferritin, IL-6, D-dimer, and LDH increased in their median values from the Wuhan to Delta wave and decreased in the Omicron wave, except PCT, which increased from the Alpha to Omicron wave. Leukocytes and neutrophils increased in their median values from the Wuhan to Delta wave and decreased in the Omicron wave, while an inverse pattern can be observed for lymphocytes, monocytes, and basophils. The best inflammatory biomarkers for predicting severe/critical COVID-19 were CRP, dNLR, LDH, and NLR (cut-off of 3.41 mg/dL, 3.05, 262 U/L, and 4.5, respectively), while for predicting death outcomes, the best biomarkers were dNLR, NLR, LDH, and NPR (cut-off of 3.6, 4.9, 278 U/L, and 0.02, respectively). For all these biomarkers, the areas under the curve (AUCs) surpassed 0.8. In the multivariate analysis, the highest adjusted OR for death was described for dNLR (8.46), NLR (7.59), LDH (5.99), and NPR (5.5), while increased lymphocytes decreased the highest adjusted OR for death (0.16). Conclusion: The study, underscoring the dynamic nature of COVID-19, brings a detailed analysis of biomarker trends that could provide valuable information for the early identification of patients at risk for severe outcomes, allowing for timely interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.