ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Improved antibody breadth with an extended primary dose interval of COVID-19 vaccine is overcome by boosters.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of new adjuvants in enhancing the immune response to a candidate of Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome Virus vaccine.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: During rollout of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines, several jurisdictions extended the interval between the first and second doses to prioritize wider population access to limited vaccine supply. This study evaluated the effects of an extended dose interval on development of antibody and cell-mediated responses following the primary dose series and a subsequent booster dose. Methods: Blood samples were collected from mRNA COVID-19 vaccine recipients at baseline and longitudinally after each dose. Samples were analyzed for SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody titers, neutralizing antibodies and memory T cell responses. Results: An extended dose interval was associated with improved breadth of neutralizing antibody responses against both ancestral and early SARS-CoV-2 variants, but not Omicron variants. Dose interval had no impact on the development of antigen-specific memory T cell responses, the memory or T helper phenotypes of responding T cells or cytokine production. The effects of the primary dose interval on immune outcomes were no longer evident after a third dose of mRNA vaccine. Discussion: An extended primary dose interval resulted in short-term benefits to humoral immunity but these were transient in the context of subsequent exposures. However, in addition to the public health benefits of wider population access to vaccines, the short-term immunological benefits of extending the dose interval may have been sustained in the absence of boosters. These findings underscore the importance of evaluating dosing intervals during the development of future vaccine candidates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.