Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40213498›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2025

School phone policies and their association with mental wellbeing, phone use, and social media use (SMART Schools): a cross-sectional observational study.

Victoria A Goodyear, Amie Randhawa, Péymane Adab, Hareth Al-Janabi, Sally Fenton, Kirsty Jones, Maria Michail, Breanna Morrison, Paul Patterson, Jonathan Quinlan and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Unfiltered Access, Unseen Harms: A Developmental and Public Health Critique of Digital Rights Discourse.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The Relationship Between Excessive Screen Time, Self-Harm, and Suicidal Behavior in Adolescents During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Integrative Literature Review.Journal of child and adolescent psychiatric nursing : official publication of the Association of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nurses, Inc · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Victoria A GoodyearSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Amie RandhawaSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Péymane AdabDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Hareth Al-JanabiInstitute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Sally FentonSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Kirsty JonesServices for Education, Birmingham, UK.
Maria MichailInstitute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Breanna MorrisonDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Paul PattersonInstitute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Jonathan QuinlanSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Alice SitchDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Rebecca TwardochlebSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Matthew Wadeukactive, ukactive Research Institute, London, UK.
Miranda PallanDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Poor mental health in adolescents can negatively affect sleep, physical activity and academic performance, and is attributed by some to increasing mobile phone use. Many countries have introduced policies to restrict phone use in schools to improve health and educational outcomes. The SMART Schools study evaluated the impact of school phone policies by comparing outcomes in adolescents who attended schools that restrict and permit phone use. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional observational study with adolescents from 30 English secondary schools, comprising 20 with restrictive (recreational phone use is not permitted) and 10 with permissive (recreational phone use is permitted) policies. The primary outcome was mental wellbeing (assessed using Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale [WEMWBS]). Secondary outcomes included smartphone and social media time. Mixed effects linear regression models were used to explore associations between school phone policy and participant outcomes, and between phone and social media use time and participant outcomes. Study registration: ISRCTN77948572. Findings: We recruited 1227 participants (age 12-15) across 30 schools. Mean WEMWBS score was 47 (SD = 9) with no evidence of a difference between groups (adjusted mean difference -0.48, 95% CI -2.05 to 1.06, p = 0.62). Adolescents attending schools with restrictive, compared to permissive policies had lower phone (adjusted mean difference -0.67 h, 95% CI -0.92 to -0.43, p = 0.00024) and social media time (adjusted mean difference -0.54 h, 95% CI -0.74 to -0.36, p = 0.00018) during school time, but there was no evidence for differences when comparing usage time on weekdays or weekends. Interpretation: There is no evidence that restrictive school policies are associated with overall phone and social media use or better mental wellbeing in adolescents. The findings do not provide evidence to support the use of school policies that prohibit phone use during the school day in their current form, and indicate that these policies require further development. Funding: Public Health Research Programme, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, UK.

Indexed as

Mental healthMobile phonesPublic healthSchool policies

Identifiers

PMID40213498
PMCPMC11984610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.