ArticleMethodsX2025
Beyond the screen: The psychological significance of ecophilia in childhood.
Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The environmental crisis, fuelled by rapid urbanization, technology, and changing lifestyles, threatens humanity. Children's disconnection from nature negatively impacts their physical, mental, and environmental well-being, increasing their risk of psychological distress, including elevated stress levels, impaired emotional stability and cognitive function, diminished social interactions, and increased susceptibility to anxiety, depression, lower self-esteem, and reduced overall life satisfaction. Consequently, environmental risks have impact on the health and development of the children from early childhood to adolescence and then to adult life. The research article aims at diminished nature connection in children and the emergence of psychological distress. This interdisciplinary research, blending ecology and psychology, uses ecocritical lenses-biophilia (love for nature and living things), topophilia (love for particular place or environment), and ecophilia (love for nature itself) -to explore how diminished nature connection impacts children's well-being. The findings emphasize the importance of reconnecting children with nature and fostering ecospirituality for their well-being and a sustainable future. This research concludes that fostering ecophilia enhances children's cognitive function, environmental awareness, and stewardship, while also promoting ecospirituality.•Human-nature interactions are key learnings for children.•This research aims to integrate ecology and psychology fostering interdisciplinary approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.