ArticleSmall science2024
Deep Learning-Based Classification of Histone-DNA Interactions Using Drying Droplet Patterns.
Article in Small science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning-driven morphological fingerprinting: rapid, accurate and low-cost pathogen identification via the analysis of dried patterns of droplets.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Article
- Deep Learning Based Surface Classification of Functionalized Polymer Coatings.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developing scalable and accurate predictive analytical methods for the classification of protein-DNA binding is critical for advancing our understanding of molecular biology, disease mechanisms, and a wide spectrum of biotechnological and medical applications. It is discovered that histone-DNA interactions can be stratified based on stain patterns created by the deposition of various nucleoprotein solutions onto a substrate. In this study, a deep-learning neural network is applied to categorize polarized light microscopy images of drying droplet deposits originating from different histone-DNA mixtures. These DNA stain patterns featured high reproducibility across different species and thus enabled comprehensive DNA categorization (100% accuracy) and accurate prediction of their respective binding affinities to histones. Eukaryotic DNA, which has a higher binding affinity to mammalian histones than prokaryotic DNA, is associated with a higher overall prediction accuracy. For a given species, the average prediction accuracy increased with DNA size. To demonstrate generalizability, a pre-trained CNN is challenged with unknown images that originated from DNA samples of species not included in the training set. The CNN classified these unknown histone-DNA samples as either strong or medium binders with 84.4% and 96.25% accuracy, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.