Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40213433›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Multiscale spatial heterogeneity of population aging in relation to its influential factors: a case study in the Shaanxi-Gansu region, China.

Fei Long, Qing Luo, Zirui Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fei LongSchool of Mathematics and Physics, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan, China.
Qing LuoSchool of Mathematics and Physics, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan, China.
Zirui LiSchool of Mathematics and Physics, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: With the extension of life expectancy and persistently low birth rates, population aging has become a pressing issue in China. This study investigates and visualizes the multiscale spatial heterogeneity of population aging and its influential factors (demographic, socioeconomic, healthcare, and natural environmental factors) across the Shaanxi-Gansu region in northwestern China for 2010 and 2020, and aims to offer some insights for designing localized aging policies to promote an older adult-friendly society. Methods: Using county-level census data and nighttime light data, spatial autocorrelation analysis and multiscale geographically weighted regression were applied to explore spatial patterns of aging and the varying impacts of different factors across scales. Results: The results reveal progressive population aging and significant spatial heterogeneous impacts in the region. In 2010, demographic factors had global effects, economic factors had local effects, and environmental factors influenced at regional scales. By 2020, healthcare factors exerted global impacts, while the spatial influence of the other factors varied within each category. Conclusion: The Shaanxi-Gansu region experienced accelerated aging along with distinct spatial-temporal heterogeneity in aging patterns. The scale and magnitude of the impacts from four types of influencing factors also shifted over the study period. These findings highlight the importance of addressing aging challenges by considering the specific local characteristics of each area.

Indexed as

AgingPopulation DynamicsAgedAged, 80 and overChinaFemaleHumansLife ExpectancyMaleMiddle AgedSocioeconomic FactorsSpatial Analysisinfluential factorsmultiscale geographically weighted regressionpopulation agingShaanxi-Gansu regionspatial heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID40213433
PMCPMC11984417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.