Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40213431›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Social workers' views and experiences of self-care practices: a qualitative interview study.

Miao Jian, Pearse Mccusker, Mary Mitchell, Autumn Roesch-Marsh, Sarah Rose, Lora Petrova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Miao JianDepartment of Social Work & Social Policy, School of Sociology, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Pearse MccuskerSchool of Social and Political Science, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Mary MitchellSchool of Social and Political Science, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Autumn Roesch-MarshSchool of Social and Political Science, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Sarah RoseSchool of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Lora PetrovaSchool of Social and Political Science, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-care is increasingly advocated as necessary for improving social workers' wellbeing. However, it remains a contested term, with limited understanding of social workers' views and experiences of what it constitutes in practice. This qualitative study employed semi-structured interviews with nine social workers from three local authorities in Scotland. Informed by vulnerability theory, a six-phase thematic analysis was applied to explore social workers' views and experiences of self-care practices. Three key themes emerged: (1) understanding and conceptualizing self-care, illustrating practitioners' perceptions of self-care as individualized, multifaceted strategies aimed at both personal wellbeing and professional efficacy, with heightened awareness since COVID-19; (2) the implementation paradox, highlighting fundamental tensions between acknowledging professional vulnerability and managing organizational demands, workload pressures, and insufficient institutional support; and (3) toward sustainable self-care practice, identifying pathways through deliberate individual practices, organizational support, educational preparation, and culturally-sensitive policies. Public health policymakers and healthcare organizations should prioritize structural reforms to enhance workforce resilience, thereby improving service quality, practitioner wellbeing, and overall public health outcomes.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCOVID-19Self CareSocial WorkersAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2Scotlandexperiencemental healthself-caresocial workervulnerabilityworkplace wellbeing

Identifiers

PMID40213431
PMCPMC11983419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.