ReviewInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2025
Carotid plaque characteristics by computed Tomography: A diagnostic accuracy systematic review.
Review in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plaque-Level Machine Learning Prediction of Intraplaque Hemorrhage in Carotid Arteries Using Computed Tomography Angiography.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Carotid Plaque Vulnerability Using Dual-energy Computed Tomography Angiography: a Prospective Observational Study.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Observational
- Carotid Plaque Characteristics Evaluation on DUS and MDCTA: Interobserver and Intermodality Agreement in a Single-Center Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Imaging Predictors of Silent Brain Lesions: Correlating Carotid Plaque Features on Ultrasound and CT in an Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Radiation-Induced Carotid Artery Disease: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Beyond the stenosis degree, the carotid plaque morphology assessed by computed tomography may improve the stroke risk stratification and is recommended to be considered before interventional treatment according to current guidelines. This study aimed to systematically review the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) to detect carotid plaque characteristics compared to histology in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid plaques. We registered the protocol in PROSPERO and searched Medline Ovid, Embase.com, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for diagnostic accuracy of CT in specific carotid plaque characteristic imaging compared to histology, without any search limitation up to May 27, 2022. Out of 8,168 studies, 20 studies that evaluated seven specific plaque characteristics were included in our systematic review. The best diagnostic performance was found for the detection of ulceration (sensitivity range 39.4-100% [mean 79.6%], specificity range 74-100% [mean 93.6%]), followed by calcification (72.7-100% [88.1%], 35.7-100% [80.1%]), lipid-rich necrotic core (63.2-95.6% [81.1%], 60-100% [80.1%]), and intraplaque hemorrhage (61.5-100% [86%], 20-99.5% [67.8%]). Only a few studies evaluated specifically vulnerable, mixed, and fibrous plaque. Diagnostic studies with larger sample sizes are needed, using novel available CT techniques that enable increasing diagnostic performance and decreasing radiation and amount of contrast agent. CT allows for highly accurate detection of carotid plaque features, particularly ulceration and calcification. These results underline the role of routine CT examinations to assess not only stenosis degree but also plaque morphology and individual patient stroke risk to better guide management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.