Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40213399›Full record

ArticleAtmospheric chemistry and physics2025

Critical load exceedances for North America and Europe using an ensemble of models and an investigation of causes of environmental impact estimate variability: an AQMEII4 study.

Paul A Makar, Philip Cheung, Christian Hogrefe, Ayodeji Akingunola, Ummugulsum Alyuz, Jesse O Bash, Michael D Bell, Roberto Bellasio, Roberto Bianconi, Tim Butler and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Atmospheric chemistry and physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Paul A MakarEnvironment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Canada.
Philip CheungEnvironment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Canada.
Christian HogrefeOffice of Research and Development (ORD), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Ayodeji AkingunolaEnvironment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Canada.
Ummugulsum AlyuzCentre for Climate Change Research (C3R), University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
Jesse O BashOffice of Research and Development (ORD), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Michael D BellAir Resources Division, National Park Service, Lakewood, CO, USA.
Roberto BellasioEnviroware srl, Concorezzo, Monza and Brianza, Italy.
Roberto BianconiEnviroware srl, Concorezzo, Monza and Brianza, Italy.
Tim ButlerResearch Institute Sustainability - Helmholtz Centre Potsdam (RIFS Potsdam), Potsdam, Germany.
Hazel CathcartEnvironment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Canada.
Olivia E CliftonGoddard Institute for Space Studies, Earth Sciences Division, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, New York, NY, USA.
Alma HodzicNational Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), Boulder, CO, USA.
Ioannis KioutsioukisDepartment of Physics, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Richard KranenburgNetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Aurelia LupascuResearch Institute Sustainability - Helmholtz Centre Potsdam (RIFS Potsdam), Potsdam, Germany.
Jason A LynchOffice of Air and Radiation (OAR), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Washington, DC, USA.
Kester MomohCentre for Climate Change Research (C3R), University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
Juan L Perez-CamanyoDepartment of Computer Languages and Systems and Software Engineering, Polytechnic University of Madrid (UPM), Madrid, Spain.
Jonathan PleimOffice of Research and Development (ORD), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Young-Hee RyuDepartment of Atmospheric Sciences, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.
Roberto San JoseDepartment of Computer Languages and Systems and Software Engineering, Polytechnic University of Madrid (UPM), Madrid, Spain.
Donna SchwedeOffice of Research and Development (ORD), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Thomas ScheuschnerCoordination Centre for Effects (CCE), Federal Environment Agency, Dessau, Germany.
Mark W ShephardEnvironment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Canada.
Ranjeet S SokhiCentre for Climate Change Research (C3R), University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
Stefano GalmariniJoint Research Centre (JRC), European Commission, Ispra, Italy.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exceedances of critical loads for deposition of sulfur (S) and nitrogen (N) in different ecosystems were estimated using European and North American ensembles of air quality models, under the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative Phase 4 (AQMEII4), to identify where the risk of ecosystem harm is expected to occur based on model deposition estimates. The ensembles were driven by common emissions and lateral boundary condition inputs. Model output was regridded to common North American and European 0.125° resolution domains, which were then used to calculate critical load exceedances. Targeted deposition diagnostics implemented in AQMEII4 allowed for an unprecedented level of post-simulation analysis to be carried out and facilitated the identification of specific causes of model-to-model variability in critical load exceedance estimates. Datasets for North American critical loads for acidity for forest soil water and aquatic ecosystems were created for this analysis. These were combined with the ensemble deposition predictions to show a substantial decrease in the area and number of locations in exceedance between 2010 and 2016 (forest soils: 13.2% to 6.1 %; aquatic ecosystems: 21.2% to 11.4 %). All models agreed regarding the direction of the ensemble exceedance change between 2010 and 2016. The North American ensemble also predicted a decrease in both the severity and total area in exceedance between the years 2010 and 2016 for eutrophication-impacted ecosystems in the USA (sensitive epiphytic lichen: 81.5% to 75.8 %). The exceedances for herbaceous-community richness also decreased between 2010 and 2016, from 13.9% to 3.9 %. The uncertainty associated with the North American eutrophication results is high; there were sharp differences between the models in predictions of both total N deposition and the change in N deposition and hence in the predicted eutrophication exceedances between the 2 years. The European ensemble was used to predict relatively static exceedances of critical loads with respect to acidification (4.48% to 4.32% from 2009 to 2010), while eutrophication exceedance increased slightly (60.2% to 62.2 %). While most models showed the same changes in critical load exceedances as the ensemble between the 2 years, the spatial extent and magnitude of exceedances varied significantly between the models. The reasons for this variation were examined in detail by first ranking the relative contribution of different sources of sulfur and nitrogen deposition in terms of deposited mass and model-to-model variability in that deposited mass, followed by their analysis using AQMEII4 diagnostics, along with evaluation of the most recent literature. All models in both the North American and European ensembles had net annual negative biases with respect to the observed wet deposition of sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium. Diagnostics and recent literature suggest that this bias may stem from insufficient cloud scavenging of aerosols and gases and may be improved through the incorporation of multiphase hydrometeor scavenging within the modelling frameworks. The inability of North American models to predict the timing of the seasonal peak in wet ammonium ion deposition (observed maximum was in April, while all models predicted a June maximum) may also relate to the need for multiphase hydrometeor scavenging (absence of snow scavenging in all models employed here). High variability in the relative importance of particulate sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium deposition fluxes between models was linked to the use of updated particle dry-deposition parameterizations in some models. However, recent literature and the further development of some of the models within the ensemble suggest these particulate biases may also be ameliorated via the incorporation of multiphase hydrometeor scavenging. Annual sulfur and nitrogen deposition prediction variability was linked to SO

Identifiers

PMID40213399
PMCPMC11980814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.