Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40213312›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2025

Cell-Free Circulating Tumor DNA for NonInvasive Molecular Profiling Among Patients Undergoing Definitive Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer.

Emily S Lebow, Jordan Eichholz, Lillian Boe, Zhigang Zhang, Leah B Kratochvil, Daphna Y Gelblum, Charles B Simone Ii, Annemarie F Shepherd, Puneeth Iyengar, Jacob Y Shin and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Applications of circulating tumor DNA in unresectable and advanced non-small cell lung cancer immunotherapy: from stratification to therapeutic guidance.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Emily S LebowDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Jordan EichholzDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Lillian BoeDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Zhigang ZhangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Leah B KratochvilDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Daphna Y GelblumDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Charles B Simone IiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Annemarie F ShepherdDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Puneeth IyengarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Jacob Y ShinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Andreas RimnerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Bob T LiDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
James M IsbellDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Narek ShaverdianDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Maria T ThorDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Daniel R GomezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We prospectively explored the utility of liquid biopsy for cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with definitive chemoradiation therapy. Methods and Materials: This prospective clinical cohort consisted of patients with unresectable, locally advanced NSCLC who had liquid biopsy testing before initiation of cancer therapy. Liquid biopsy testing was performed using an institutional assay that included 129 genes and paired white blood cell sequencing. Variant allele frequency was defined as the proportion of mutant alleles at a particular genetic locus. A US Food and Drug Administration-recognized database (OncoKB) was used to classify alterations. We evaluated progression-free survival from the start of radiation therapy using the log-rank test. Results: Among 25 patients with prospective testing of ctDNA levels before therapy initiation, 18 patients had adenocarcinoma (72%), 7 patients had squamous cell carcinoma (28%), and 23 (92%) were former or current smokers. Twelve patients (48%) received adjuvant durvalumab. The median radiation dose was 60 Gy in 30 fractions (range, 55-66 Gy in 20-33 fractions). Seventy-six percent of patients (n = 18) had one or more alterations detected (median, 3 alterations, range, 1-8), including genomic markers of radiation response in 3 patients. The most common driver alteration detected was Conclusions: Prospective liquid biopsy testing among patients treated with definitive chemoradiation therapy identifies driver alterations and markers of radiation response with direct implications for therapy personalization.

Identifiers

PMID40213312
PMCPMC11982964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.