Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40213304›Full record

ReviewTaiwan journal of ophthalmology

Acute acquired comitant esotropia: Current understanding of its etiological classification and treatment strategies.

Noriko Nishikawa, Miho Sato

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Taiwan journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Risk factors and predictors for botulinum toxin type A reinjection within six months in patients with acute acquired concomitant esotropia.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Noriko NishikawaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan.
Miho SatoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute acquired comitant esotropia (AACE) is characterized by acute onset of esotropia without limitation of eye movements in children and adults. AACE has been considered relatively rare, and most previous reports were small case series. However, recently, there has been great interest in this disease because of the rapid increase in the number of cases speculated to be related to the use of digital devices. In a growing number of studies, disputes remain regarding its etiology, clinical features, management, and classification. Herein, we review the literature on the history, clinical features, possible etiologic classifications, and treatment strategies for AACE to provide a comprehensive and updated understanding of the disease.

Indexed as

Acquired nonaccommodative comitant esotropiaacute acquired comitant esotropiadigital devicestrabismus surgery

Identifiers

PMID40213304
PMCPMC11981569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.