Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40213273›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025

Multivariate Poisson lognormal distribution for modeling counts from modern biological data: An overview.

Sanjeena Subedi, Utkarsh J Dang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sanjeena SubediSchool of Mathematics & Statistics, Carleton University, Ontario, Canada.
Utkarsh J DangDepartment of Health Sciences, Carleton University, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern biological data are often multivariate discrete counts, and there has been a dearth of statistical distributions to directly model such counts in an efficient manner. While mixed Poisson distributions, e.g., negative binomial distribution, are often the distribution of choice for univariate data, multivariate statistical distributions and their algorithmic implementations tend to have different drawbacks, e.g., non-tractable distributions, non-closed form solutions for parameter estimates, constrained correlation structures, and slow convergence during iterative parameter estimation. Herein, we provide an overview of the Poisson lognormal and multivariate Poisson lognormal distributions. These distributions can be written in an hierarchical fashion. An efficient variational approximation-based parameter estimation strategy as well as a hybrid approach for full Bayesian posterior estimation is available for such models, allowing for scaling up and modeling high-dimensional data. We provide comparisons of the univariate Poisson, the negative binomial, and the Poisson lognormal distributions in terms of the estimated mean-variance relationships using simulations and example real datasets. We also discuss the properties of the multivariate Poisson lognormal distribution, and ability to directly model count data including zero counts, over-dispersion, both positive and negative covariance elements, and the mapping from correlations in the latent space vs. the observed space. Finally, we illustrate their use through two model-based clustering examples using a mixtures of distributions approach in RNA-seq and microbiome data.

Indexed as

Count dataMixture modelsModel-based clustering and classificationPoisson lognormal distributionVariational inference

Identifiers

PMID40213273
PMCPMC11984615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.