ArticleHealth science reports2025
Polypharmacy and Potentially Inappropriate Medication in Iranian People With Metabolic Syndrome: Epidemiological Aspects and Related Factors, a Multi-Level Cross-Sectional National Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Polypharmacy, characterized by the concurrent use of five or more medications in a prescription, potentially resulting in adverse outcomes, is frequently observed among individuals with metabolic syndrome, which encompasses a collection of conditions that co-occur, heightening the likelihood of heart disease, stroke, and type 2 diabetes. This study seeks to ascertain the prevalence of polypharmacy and the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) among Iranian patients with metabolic syndrome, while also evaluating the contributing individual and sociodemographic factors. Methods: This was a population-based, cross-sectional national study. Two databases were used: (a) Iranians Health Insurance Service database and (b) Iran's STEPS 2016 survey. Patients with metabolic syndrome conjoint in both databases were selected. Among these patients, polypharmacy and PIM were evaluated, and their association with individual and sociodemographic factors was assessed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze the associations. All statistical analyses were done using SPSS 22 and Python 3. Results: Out of 2075 metabolic syndrome patients, 10.3% had polypharmacy. Polypharmacy significantly increased by age (OR: 4.334, adjusted for > 80-year-olds vs. 25-39-year-olds [CI: 1.664-11.283], Conclusions: Since the area of residency affects polypharmacy and PIM more significantly than wealth status and education level, it is important to implement preventive measures in urban areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.