Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40213260›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025

Comparison of intrathecal bupivacaine with tramadol and bupivacaine with dexamethasone for post cesarean section pain relief extension in elective cesarean sections under spinal anesthesia in resource limited setup: prospective observational study.

Sintayehu Samuel Lorato, Selman Reshad, Elizabeth Seifu, Gediwon Gebrehiwot, Astwmamagn Achule, Hunde Amsalu, Temesgen Mamo, Teketel Abebe, Mitiku Desalegn, Zekarias Markos and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sintayehu Samuel LoratoDepartment of Anesthesia, Wachemo University, College of Health Science and Medicine, Hossana, Ethiopia.
Selman ReshadDepartment of Anesthesia, Wachemo University, College of Health Science and Medicine, Hossana, Ethiopia.
Elizabeth SeifuWolaita Sodo University, College of Health Science and Medicine, School of Anesthesia, Sodo, Ethiopia.
Gediwon GebrehiwotDepartment of Anesthesia, Wachemo University, College of Health Science and Medicine, Hossana, Ethiopia.
Astwmamagn AchuleDepartment of Anesthesia, Arba Minch University, College of Health Science and Medicine, Arba Minch, Ethiopia.
Hunde AmsaluDepartment of Anesthesia, Wachemo University, College of Health Science and Medicine, Hossana, Ethiopia.
Temesgen MamoDepartment of Anesthesia, Wachemo University, College of Health Science and Medicine, Hossana, Ethiopia.
Teketel AbebeDepartment of Anesthesia, Wachemo University, College of Health Science and Medicine, Hossana, Ethiopia.
Mitiku DesalegnDepartment of Anesthesia, Wachemo University, College of Health Science and Medicine, Hossana, Ethiopia.
Zekarias MarkosDepartment of Anesthesia, Wachemo University, College of Health Science and Medicine, Hossana, Ethiopia.
Adissu MekuanintDepartment of Anesthesia, Wachemo University, College of Health Science and Medicine, Hossana, Ethiopia.
Sara AlemnewObstetrics and Gynecology at Wachemo University, College of Health Science and Medicine, Hossana, Ethiopia.
Tsegenet SahleWolaita Sodo University, College of Health Science and Medicine, School of Anesthesia, Sodo, Ethiopia.
Yidnekachew DedachewEmergency Medicine and Critical Care at Wachemo University, College of Health Science and Medicine, Hossana, Ethiopia.
Yisehak WoldeDepartment of Anesthesia, Wachemo University, College of Health Science and Medicine, Hossana, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Spinal anesthesia provides the most reliable block for lower abdominal and orthopedic surgery. Spinal anesthesia reduces the risks associated with general anesthesia, such as aspiration and difficulty managing the airway. As a result, numerous adjuvants were added to local anesthetics, including epinephrine, phenylephrine, clonidine, opioids, dexamethasone, tramadol, and so on. The objective of this study is to compare the analgesic duration of spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine-tramadol and bupivacaine-dexamethasone to cesarean section pain. Methods: Institutional-based prospective cohort study was employed. Totally 164 participants has participated in this study. A consecutive sampling technique was employed. All obstetric patients undergoing elective caesarean surgery under spinal anesthesia and who will fulfill inclusion criteria were included in this study. The chi-squared, Result: The total analgesia requirement within 24 hours for diclofenac, tramadol, morphine, and pethidine were analyzed and there was a statistically significant difference among the groups with all anti pains, Conclusion: This study found that using tramadol as an adjuvant with bupivacaine for intrathecal route significantly extended duration of pain-free period after subarachnoid anesthesia, as compared to 4 mg dexamethasone added to intrathecal bupivacaine.

Indexed as

bupivacainecesarean sectiondexamethasonespinal anesthesiatramadol

Identifiers

PMID40213260
PMCPMC11981291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.