ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Rivaroxaban versus dalteparin for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Traditionally, low molecular weight heparin, such as dalteparin, has been the first-line treatment for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, recent studies suggest that rivaroxaban, a direct oral anticoagulant, may offer comparable efficacy with the convenience of oral administration. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban versus dalteparin in managing cancer-associated VTE, focusing on recurrence rates, bleeding events, and patient adherence. Methods: This review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines, systematically retrieving data from PubMed and Cochrane databases using structured search terms related to cancer, VTE, and anticoagulation. Data on recurrent VTE, major bleeding, and patient outcomes were extracted. Statistical analyses were performed using a random-effects model to account for heterogeneity. Results: Nine studies were analyzed, encompassing a range of study designs across multiple countries. The findings show no significant difference in major bleeding risk between rivaroxaban and dalteparin (risk ratio: 0.91, Conclusion: Rivaroxaban presents a viable alternative to dalteparin for treating cancer-associated VTE, showing comparable safety regarding major bleeding and potential efficacy in reducing DVT recurrence. This study supports the potential for more standardized guidelines that include rivaroxaban as a feasible option in cancer-associated VTE management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.