ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Acute renal infarction as an unusual presentation of hypertensive crisis in an elder female patient: a case report and literature review.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Acute renal infarction is a rare condition characterized by the obstruction of renal arteries, leading to ischemia and infarction of the renal tissue. It is often underdiagnosed and can present with acute abdominal pain. Case presentation: A 70-year-old female with a 1-year history of hypertension presented to the emergency room with severe sharp flank pain and vomiting of 8 hours duration. She had no comorbidities and was taking Amlodipine 10 mg for hypertension. Vital signs revealed severely elevated blood pressure (230/180 mmHg) and a pulse rate of 98 bpm. Clinical examination showed tenderness over the right kidney without signs of abdominal guarding. Renal function was normal, and there were no signs of systemic inflammation. Imaging studies, including abdominal ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT, confirmed the diagnosis of unilateral renal infarction. Clinical discussion: A multidisciplinary team, including Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Surgery, Urology, and Interventional Radiology, convened to discuss the treatment approach. Considering the duration of symptoms and the preserved renal parenchyma, revascularization was not pursued. The patient was admitted and started on therapeutic dose low molecular heparin for anticoagulation. Blood pressure was controlled using intravenous Labetalol. The patient showed significant clinical improvement and was discharged on apixaban and Amlodipine. Follow-up lab tests after 1 month demonstrated normal kidney function. Conclusion: This case highlights the importance of considering renal infarction in the differential diagnosis of acute abdominal pain, especially in hypertensive patients. Early recognition and appropriate management are crucial for preventing complications and preserving renal function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.