Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40213214›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025

Comparison of outcomes of community-acquired sepsis and hospital-acquired sepsis in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pratik Lamichhane, Imesha Kalansuriya, Muhammed Faris Manhalattummal, Kapil Khanal, Anushka Agrawal, Tejaswi Pasam, Pukar Pandit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pratik LamichhaneGP Koirala National Center for Respiratory Diseases, Belchautara,Tanahun, Nepal.
Imesha KalansuriyaMedical University of Americas School of Medicine, Nevis, St. Kitts & Nevis.
Muhammed Faris ManhalattummalGovernment Medical College, Kottayam, Kerala, India.
Kapil KhanalMaharajgunj Medical Campus, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Anushka AgrawalAll India Institute of Medical Sciences-New Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Tejaswi PasamMontefiore Medical Center, New York City, New York, USA.
Pukar PanditGP Koirala National Center for Respiratory Diseases, Belchautara,Tanahun, Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Subgrouping sepsis by the location of onset, such as hospital-acquired sepsis or community-acquired sepsis, aids in clinical management, planning future interventional studies, and the formulation of healthcare policies. The aim of our study is to describe differences in clinical outcomes between hospital and community-acquired sepsis admitted to critical care units. Patients and methods: PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar were systematically searched from inception to February 2024. Any observational studies comparing the outcomes of adult patients (≥18 years) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with community-acquired sepsis and hospital-acquired sepsis were included in the analysis. The primary outcome assessed by our study was the risk of mortality in the patients, calculated as a pooled odd's ratio with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Other secondary outcomes, like length of stay in the ICU, and length of overall hospital stay, were also extracted and studied. Results: The risk of death in patients with hospital-acquired sepsis was significantly higher than that in patients with community-acquired sepsis (OR = 2.19, 95% CI = 1.82-2.63, Conclusions: The risk of mortality, the length of ICU stay and overall hospital stay was significantly higher in hospital-acquired sepsis compared to community-acquired sepsis.

Indexed as

community-onset sepsishospital-onset sepsisintensive care unitmortalitysepsis

Identifiers

PMID40213214
PMCPMC11981430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.