ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
A comprehensive analysis and systematic review of giant serpentine aneurysms.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Giant serpentine aneurysm: Imaging features including potential diagnostic utility of arterial spin labeling.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Parent Artery Occlusion for a Giant Serpentine Aneurysm of the Internal Carotid Artery under Electrophysiological Monitoring: A Case Report.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Giant Serpentine Aneurysms (GSA) are a rare subgroup of complex intracranial vascular anomalies characterized by unusually large and convoluted structures within cerebral arteries. This systematic review examines the historical context, clinical presentations, diagnostic methodologies, and evolving treatments specific to GSAs. Its goal is to advance patient care strategies and outcomes within this intricate neurovascular domain. Methods: Research encompassing patients diagnosed with GSAs was gathered from PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. Only comprehensive human studies published in English were considered, using search terms like giant serpentine aneurysm, thrombosed aneurysm, bypass, and angiography. Data regarding patient age, gender, symptoms upon presentation, treatments, recovery duration, and outcomes were systematically documented. Result: This analysis of 83 patients with GSA found the middle cerebral artery as the most common site (39.8%). Headaches (54.2%) and visual issues (9.8%) prevailed as symptoms. Seizures correlated with more post-op problems. Females encountered more neurological issues post-surgery (46.4%). Treatment methods varied by location but didn't significantly affect age or hospital stay length. Conclusion: Early recognition and intervention are crucial for mitigating neurological deficits and improving patient prognosis in GSAs. Expanded research and awareness are needed for definitive diagnostic protocols and treatment guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.